Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CRIS Current Research Information System
Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical
disease, and appendectomy is the treatment of choice in the
majority of cases. A correct diagnosis is key for decreasing the
negative appendectomy rate. The management can become difficult
in case of complicated appendicitis. The aim of this study is to
describe the worldwide clinical and diagnostic work-up and
management of AA in surgical departments. Methods: This
prospective multicenter observational study was performed in 116
worldwide surgical departments from 44 countries over a 6-month
period (April 1, 2016-September 30, 2016). All consecutive
patients admitted to surgical departments with a clinical
diagnosis of AA were included in the study. Results: A total of
4282 patients were enrolled in the POSAW study, 1928 (45\%) women
and 2354 (55\%) men, with a median age of 29 years. Nine hundred
and seven (21.2\%) patients underwent an abdominal CT scan, 1856
(43.3\%) patients an US, and 285 (6.7\%) patients both CT scan
and US. A total of 4097 (95.7\%) patients underwent surgery; 1809
(42.2\%) underwent open appendectomy and 2215 (51.7\%) had
laparoscopic appendectomy. One hundred eighty-five (4.3\%)
patients were managed conservatively. Major complications
occurred in 199 patients (4.6\%). The overall mortality rate was
0.28\%. Conclusions: The results of the present study confirm the
clinical value of imaging techniques and prognostic scores.
Appendectomy remains the most effective treatment of acute
appendicitis. Mortality rate is low.
1, M.S., L Baiocchi 2, G., 3, S.D.S., 4, F.F., M Labricciosa 5, F., 6, L.A., et al. (2018). Prospective observational study on acute appendicitis worldwide
({POSAW}). WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 13, 1-10.
Prospective observational study on acute appendicitis worldwide
({POSAW})
Massimo Sartelli 1;Gian L Baiocchi 2;Salomone Di Saverio 3;Francesco Ferrara 4;Francesco M Labricciosa 5;Luca Ansaloni 6;Federico Coccolini 6;Deepak Vijayan 7;Ashraf Abbas 8;Hariscine K Abongwa 9;John Agboola 10;Adamu Ahmed 11;Lali Akhmeteli 12;Nezih Akkapulu 13;Seckin Akkucuk 14;Fatih Altintoprak 15;Aurelia L Andreiev 7;Dimitrios Anyfantakis 16;Boiko Atanasov 17;Miklosh Bala 18;Dimitrios Balalis 19;Oussama Baraket 20;Giovanni Bellanova 21;Marcelo Beltran 22;Renato Bessa Melo 23;Roberto Bini 24;Konstantinos Bouliaris 25;Daniele Brunelli 26;Adrian Castillo 27;Marco Catani 28;Asri Che Jusoh 29;Alain Chichom-Mefire 30;Gianfranco Cocorullo 31;Raul Coimbra 32;Elif Colak 33;Silvia Costa 34;Koray Das 35;Samir Delibegovic 36;Zaza Demetrashvili 37;Isidoro Di Carlo 38;Nadezda Kiseleva 39;Tamer El Zalabany 40;Mario Faro 41;Margarida Ferreira 42;Gustavo P Fraga 43;Mahir Gachabayov 44;Wagih M Ghnnam 45;Teresa Giménez Maurel 46;Georgios Gkiokas 47;Carlos A Gomes 48;Ewen Griffiths 49;Ali Guner 50;Sanjay Gupta 51;Andreas Hecker 52;Elcio S Hirano 43;Adrien Hodonou 53;Martin Hutan 54;Orestis Ioannidis 55 56;Arda Isik 57;Georgy Ivakhov 58;Sumita Jain 59;Mantas Jokubauskas 60;Aleksandar Karamarkovic 61;Saila Kauhanen 62;Robin Kaushik 51;Alfie Kavalakat 63;Jakub Kenig 64;Vladimir Khokha 65;Desmond Khor 66;Dennis Kim 27;Jae I Kim 67;Victor Kong 68;Konstantinos Lasithiotakis 69;Pedro Leão 70;Miguel Leon 71;Andrey Litvin 72;Varut Lohsiriwat 73;Eudaldo López-Tomassetti Fernandez 74;Eftychios Lostoridis 75;James Maciel 27;Piotr Major 76;Ana Dimova 77;Dimitrios Manatakis 78;Athanasio Marinis 79;Aleix Martinez-Perez 80;Sanjay Marwah 81;Michael McFarlane 82 83;Cristian Mesina 84;Michał Pędziwiatr 85;Nickos Michalopoulos 86;Evangelos Misiakos 87;Ali Mohamedahmed 88;Radu Moldovanu 89;Giulia Montori 6;Raghuveer Mysore Narayana 90;Ionut Negoi 91;Ioannis Nikolopoulos 92;Giuseppe Novelli 93;Viktors Novikovs 39;Iyiade Olaoye 94;Abdelkarim Omari 95;Carlos A Ordoñez 96;Mouaqit Ouadii 97;Zeynep Ozkan 98;Ajay Pal 99;Gian M Palini 93;Lars I Partecke 100;Francesco Pata 101;Michał Pędziwiatr 102;Gerson A Pereira Júnior 103;Tadeja Pintar 104;Magdalena Pisarska 105;Cesar F Ploneda-Valencia 106;Konstantinos Pouggouras 75;Vinod Prabhu 107;Padmakumar Ramakrishnapillai 108;Jean-Marc Regimbeau 109;Marianne Reitz 110;Daniel Rios-Cruz 111;Sten Saar 112;Boris Sakakushev 113;Charalampos Seretis 114;Alexander Sazhin 58;Vishal Shelat 115;Matej Skrovina 116;Dmitry Smirnov 117;Charalampos Spyropoulos 118;Marcin Strzałka 119;Peep Talving 112;Ricardo A Teixeira Gonsaga 120;George Theobald 7;Gia Tomadze 121;Myftar Torba 122;Cristian Tranà 1;Jan Ulrych 123;Mustafa Y Uzunoğlu 14;Alin Vasilescu 124;Savino Occhionorelli 125;Aurélien Venara 126;Andras Vereczkei 127;Nereo Vettoretto 128;Nutu Vlad 124;Maciej Walędziak 129;Tonguç U Yilmaz 130;Kuo-Ching Yuan 131;Cui Yunfeng 132;Justas Zilinskas 60;Gérard Grelpois 109;Fausto Catena
2018
Abstract
Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical
disease, and appendectomy is the treatment of choice in the
majority of cases. A correct diagnosis is key for decreasing the
negative appendectomy rate. The management can become difficult
in case of complicated appendicitis. The aim of this study is to
describe the worldwide clinical and diagnostic work-up and
management of AA in surgical departments. Methods: This
prospective multicenter observational study was performed in 116
worldwide surgical departments from 44 countries over a 6-month
period (April 1, 2016-September 30, 2016). All consecutive
patients admitted to surgical departments with a clinical
diagnosis of AA were included in the study. Results: A total of
4282 patients were enrolled in the POSAW study, 1928 (45\%) women
and 2354 (55\%) men, with a median age of 29 years. Nine hundred
and seven (21.2\%) patients underwent an abdominal CT scan, 1856
(43.3\%) patients an US, and 285 (6.7\%) patients both CT scan
and US. A total of 4097 (95.7\%) patients underwent surgery; 1809
(42.2\%) underwent open appendectomy and 2215 (51.7\%) had
laparoscopic appendectomy. One hundred eighty-five (4.3\%)
patients were managed conservatively. Major complications
occurred in 199 patients (4.6\%). The overall mortality rate was
0.28\%. Conclusions: The results of the present study confirm the
clinical value of imaging techniques and prognostic scores.
Appendectomy remains the most effective treatment of acute
appendicitis. Mortality rate is low.
1, M.S., L Baiocchi 2, G., 3, S.D.S., 4, F.F., M Labricciosa 5, F., 6, L.A., et al. (2018). Prospective observational study on acute appendicitis worldwide
({POSAW}). WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 13, 1-10.
1, Massimo Sartelli; L Baiocchi 2, Gian; 3, Salomone Di Saverio; 4, Francesco Ferrara; M Labricciosa 5, Francesco; 6, Luca Ansaloni; 6, Federico Cocco...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1006944
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
ND
ND
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.