Wear and roughness analysis of two highly filled flowable composites

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate surface roughness and wear of highly filled flowables and traditional packable composites. Additionally, the effect of polymerization time on these parameters was evaluated. Two flowable higly filled composites (CMf—Clearfil Majesty ES flow-low viscosity, Kuraray and GUf—Gaenial Universal Injectable, GC) and two packable composites (CM—Clearfil Majesty ES-2, Kuraray and GU—Gaenial A'CHORD, GC) were used to create 160 specimens (n = 40;8 × 6 × 4mm). For each tested material, two subgroups were considered according to the polymerization time (n = 20): 10 s or 80 s. After setting, the specimens were subjected to chewing simulations (240.000 cycles, 20N), and wear was measured by the laser integrated in the chewing simulator. The surface roughness was measured using a rugosimeter, before and after chewing cycles. Two representative specimens per group were observed under scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data were collected and statistically analyzed (p < 0.05). Wear analysis highlighted statistically significant differences between the groups: CMf10-CMf80 (p = 0.000), CMf10-CM10 (p = 0.019), CMf10-GUf10 (p = 0.002), CM10-CM80 (p = 0.000), CM80-GUf80 (p = 0.02), GUf10-GUf80 (p = 0.000), GUf10-GU10 (p = 0.043) and GU10-GU80 (p = 0.013). Statistically significant differences in surface roughness were highlighted between the groups: CMf10-CMf80 (p = 0.038), CMf80-CM80 (p = 0.019), CMf80-GU80 (p = 0.010), CM80-GUf80 (p = 0.34) and GUf80-GU80 (p = 0.003). Surface roughness and wear of highly filled flowable composites were comparable to that of traditional paste composites. Furthermore, a longer curing time leads to an improvement in the mechanical properties of the composites. Highly filled flowables can be a valid alternative to paste composites in occlusal areas due to its similar surface roughness and wear values, especially when overcured.