BACKGROUND: Peritoneal cystic mesothelioma (PCM) is an uncommon clinical pathology. Its high rate of recurrence following partial or total resection as well as its spontaneous onset of malignancy have been well documented in a series of case studies. The medical community has yet to define standardized treatment guidelines for PCM. CASE REPORTS: This study reviews the case of 2 patients admitted and treated for PCM. Recent studies have reported improved recurrence and survival rates achieved by means of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), especially when used as first-line treatments. However, whether or not the use of CRS and HIPEC is more effective than a surgical regimen of multiple debulking procedures, is still the subject of debate. CONCLUSION: CRS and HIPEC as first-line treatments have lower morbidity and mortality rates than regimens of multiple back-to-back surgical procedures, and as such, the CRS/HIPEC method appears to be the more successful approach.

Coccolini, F., Manfredi, R., Catena, F., Vallicelli, C., Andrea De Iaco, P., Martoni, A., et al. (2012). Peritoneal cystic mesothelioma: are surgery and {HIPEC} optimal first-line treatments?. ONKOLOGIE, 35(4), 200-202.

Peritoneal cystic mesothelioma: are surgery and {HIPEC} optimal first-line treatments?

Fausto Catena;Pier Andrea De Iaco;
2012

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal cystic mesothelioma (PCM) is an uncommon clinical pathology. Its high rate of recurrence following partial or total resection as well as its spontaneous onset of malignancy have been well documented in a series of case studies. The medical community has yet to define standardized treatment guidelines for PCM. CASE REPORTS: This study reviews the case of 2 patients admitted and treated for PCM. Recent studies have reported improved recurrence and survival rates achieved by means of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), especially when used as first-line treatments. However, whether or not the use of CRS and HIPEC is more effective than a surgical regimen of multiple debulking procedures, is still the subject of debate. CONCLUSION: CRS and HIPEC as first-line treatments have lower morbidity and mortality rates than regimens of multiple back-to-back surgical procedures, and as such, the CRS/HIPEC method appears to be the more successful approach.
2012
Coccolini, F., Manfredi, R., Catena, F., Vallicelli, C., Andrea De Iaco, P., Martoni, A., et al. (2012). Peritoneal cystic mesothelioma: are surgery and {HIPEC} optimal first-line treatments?. ONKOLOGIE, 35(4), 200-202.
Coccolini, Federico; Manfredi, Roberto; Catena, Fausto; Vallicelli, Carlo; Andrea De Iaco, Pier; Martoni, Andrea; Lazzareschi, Daniel; Ansaloni, Luca...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1001862
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact