The following text aims to address the relationship between art and public space focusing on the memorial strategies that unfold in it and the relationship they have with the aesthetic, perceptual-sensorial sphere, through the urban dimension. Beginning by noting the various tendencies to subject forgetting and memory to a kind of neutralizing naturalization or reinclusion, the following text will discuss, first, a number of forms of remembrance that insist on nonlinearity, latency, and that take place in whole or in part below the level of consciousness (§ 2). The discourse will then move on to examine the intertwining of theoretical problems and realizations of memorial paths based on innovative experiential forms (§ 3). And to analyze some specific cases in which the memorial process in public space, particularly in the Berlin context, is put at the center, comparing the results, as in the case of Libeskind’s Jewish Museum and Stih and Schnok’s Places of Remembrance (§§ 4–6). To conclude with a review of the acquisitions that this trajectory has made possible (§7).
Borsari, A. (2025). Places of Remembrance: On Urban Aesthetics and Experiential Memories. Cham : Springer Nature [10.1007/978-3-031-71473-3_18].
Places of Remembrance: On Urban Aesthetics and Experiential Memories
andrea borsariPrimo
2025
Abstract
The following text aims to address the relationship between art and public space focusing on the memorial strategies that unfold in it and the relationship they have with the aesthetic, perceptual-sensorial sphere, through the urban dimension. Beginning by noting the various tendencies to subject forgetting and memory to a kind of neutralizing naturalization or reinclusion, the following text will discuss, first, a number of forms of remembrance that insist on nonlinearity, latency, and that take place in whole or in part below the level of consciousness (§ 2). The discourse will then move on to examine the intertwining of theoretical problems and realizations of memorial paths based on innovative experiential forms (§ 3). And to analyze some specific cases in which the memorial process in public space, particularly in the Berlin context, is put at the center, comparing the results, as in the case of Libeskind’s Jewish Museum and Stih and Schnok’s Places of Remembrance (§§ 4–6). To conclude with a review of the acquisitions that this trajectory has made possible (§7).| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ABorsari_Places of Remembrance-Accepted.pdf
embargo fino al 19/12/2025
Tipo:
Postprint / Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM) - versione accettata per la pubblicazione dopo la peer-review
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
120.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
120.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


