From the analysis of the international literature, there is a significant variety of terminological statements, among which we have selected ten that, in our opinion, represent paradigmatic examples of the bi-directional link between the conceptual definition of a phenomenon and the socio-cultural context of reference. These are: (1) nonprofit sector; (2) charitable sector; (3) philanthropic sector; (4) informal sector; (5) Third Sector; (6) independent sector; (7) voluntary sector; (8) private nongovernmental sector; (9) social economics; (10) intermediary system and private initiative.

Bassi, A. (2025). The Terminological Debate. New York : Springer [10.1007/978-3-031-67896-7_5].

The Terminological Debate

Bassi Andrea
2025

Abstract

From the analysis of the international literature, there is a significant variety of terminological statements, among which we have selected ten that, in our opinion, represent paradigmatic examples of the bi-directional link between the conceptual definition of a phenomenon and the socio-cultural context of reference. These are: (1) nonprofit sector; (2) charitable sector; (3) philanthropic sector; (4) informal sector; (5) Third Sector; (6) independent sector; (7) voluntary sector; (8) private nongovernmental sector; (9) social economics; (10) intermediary system and private initiative.
2025
The Future of Third Sector Research From Theory to Definitions, Classifications and Aggregation Towards New Research Paths
49
66
Bassi, A. (2025). The Terminological Debate. New York : Springer [10.1007/978-3-031-67896-7_5].
Bassi, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
978-3-031-67896-7_5.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 297.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
297.14 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/998757
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact