Though many philosophers agree that stakes play a role in ordinary knowledge ascriptions, there is disagreement about what explains this. In this article, we disarm an important motivation for epistemic contextualism and interest‐relative invariantism. We accomplish this by presenting a stringent test of whether there is a stakes effect on ordinary knowledge ascription. Having shown that, even on a stringent way of testing, stakes fail to impact ordinary knowledge ascription, we will conclude that we should take another look at classical invariantism.
Rose, D., Machery, E., Stich, S., Alai, M., Angelucci, A., Berninas, R., et al. (2024). Nessuna posta in gioco nella conoscenza. Bologna : ArchetipoLibri.
Nessuna posta in gioco nella conoscenza
Moruzzi, Sebastiano;Volpe, Giorgio;
2024
Abstract
Though many philosophers agree that stakes play a role in ordinary knowledge ascriptions, there is disagreement about what explains this. In this article, we disarm an important motivation for epistemic contextualism and interest‐relative invariantism. We accomplish this by presenting a stringent test of whether there is a stakes effect on ordinary knowledge ascription. Having shown that, even on a stringent way of testing, stakes fail to impact ordinary knowledge ascription, we will conclude that we should take another look at classical invariantism.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rose_et_al_traduzione.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Testo con bibliografia
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
744.78 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
744.78 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


