The imperative to 'speak the truth' even before kings, without fear of uttering the criticism necessary for the salvation of the kingdom and the soul of the rulers, may appear at odds with a specific form of criticism prominent in the works of some post-Carolingian bishops: allusiveness. The veiled and indirect attack, which strikes out allusively without naming its target, circumventing the danger structurally present in the exercise of parrhesia, may in fact appear to be the opposite of the 'frank talk' of the Christian parresiast. This study aims to show how this contradiction is only apparent and can be solved once the significance of allusive criticism in the post-Carolingian cultural context is understood and the innovative model of criticism it invoked is recognised. Thanks to a recent season of studies on the medieval reception of Persius and Juvenal, we know that between the end of the 9th and the beginning of the 10th century there was a rediscovery of classical satirical poetry: this late-Carolingian reception of satire identified allusiveness as one of the characteristics of the genre deputed to the reprehensio of the mores of the world. The reflection was set in motion by the encounter between these new readings, the imperatives of Carolingian political theology and the contingencies of contemporary political life and generated a first experimental Christian appropriation of the satirical model, which from that moment on began its own journey in Western European culture. This appropriation and reinvention of satirical criticism took its first steps in the context of the Kingdom of Italy: the study follows its first traces in the Gesta Berengarii imperatoris (915-924) and in particular in the Praeloquia (written from 935 onwards), with which bishop Rather of Verona proposed the first reflection on episcopal criticism of kings in an allusive form, invoking the model of classical satire. Rather’s proposal was taken up and developed by bishop Atto of Vercelli, with a work that constitutes a first ...

Giacomo Vignodelli (2023). Satire et critique allusive dans l'Europe post-carolingienne. Turnhout : Brepols [10.1484/M.BHCMA-EB.5.131531].

Satire et critique allusive dans l'Europe post-carolingienne

Giacomo Vignodelli
2023

Abstract

The imperative to 'speak the truth' even before kings, without fear of uttering the criticism necessary for the salvation of the kingdom and the soul of the rulers, may appear at odds with a specific form of criticism prominent in the works of some post-Carolingian bishops: allusiveness. The veiled and indirect attack, which strikes out allusively without naming its target, circumventing the danger structurally present in the exercise of parrhesia, may in fact appear to be the opposite of the 'frank talk' of the Christian parresiast. This study aims to show how this contradiction is only apparent and can be solved once the significance of allusive criticism in the post-Carolingian cultural context is understood and the innovative model of criticism it invoked is recognised. Thanks to a recent season of studies on the medieval reception of Persius and Juvenal, we know that between the end of the 9th and the beginning of the 10th century there was a rediscovery of classical satirical poetry: this late-Carolingian reception of satire identified allusiveness as one of the characteristics of the genre deputed to the reprehensio of the mores of the world. The reflection was set in motion by the encounter between these new readings, the imperatives of Carolingian political theology and the contingencies of contemporary political life and generated a first experimental Christian appropriation of the satirical model, which from that moment on began its own journey in Western European culture. This appropriation and reinvention of satirical criticism took its first steps in the context of the Kingdom of Italy: the study follows its first traces in the Gesta Berengarii imperatoris (915-924) and in particular in the Praeloquia (written from 935 onwards), with which bishop Rather of Verona proposed the first reflection on episcopal criticism of kings in an allusive form, invoking the model of classical satire. Rather’s proposal was taken up and developed by bishop Atto of Vercelli, with a work that constitutes a first ...
2023
Liberté de parole : Les élites savantes et la critique des pouvoirs, Orient et Occident, VIIIe-XIIIe siècle
213
241
Giacomo Vignodelli (2023). Satire et critique allusive dans l'Europe post-carolingienne. Turnhout : Brepols [10.1484/M.BHCMA-EB.5.131531].
Giacomo Vignodelli
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vignodelli_2022_Satire_et_critique_allusive_dans_Europe_post-carolingienne.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione 1.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.47 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/970151
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact