Reactive and proactive approaches aim to provide dynamic assessment of the overall system risk by following partially different paths. The Bayesian inference-based dynamic risk assessment monitors and processes data from past incidents and near misses. This allows for update of safety barrier failure probabilities in a reactive way. The risk barometer, however, dynamically assesses health of safety barriers on the basis of a wide range of indicators. This allows capturing early deviations and underlying causes of accidents in a more proactive fashion. However, the comparison of the two techniques performed in this chapter shows that they both possess reactive and proactive traits to some extent. Moreover, despite the fact that they may show little complementarity, their overlapping may be useful for (partial) mutual validation.

Scarponi G.E., Paltrinieri N. (2016). Comparison and Complementarity between Reactive and Proactive Approaches. Oxford : Elsevier Inc. [10.1016/B978-0-12-803765-2.00008-1].

Comparison and Complementarity between Reactive and Proactive Approaches

Scarponi G. E.
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Paltrinieri N.
Writing – Review & Editing
2016

Abstract

Reactive and proactive approaches aim to provide dynamic assessment of the overall system risk by following partially different paths. The Bayesian inference-based dynamic risk assessment monitors and processes data from past incidents and near misses. This allows for update of safety barrier failure probabilities in a reactive way. The risk barometer, however, dynamically assesses health of safety barriers on the basis of a wide range of indicators. This allows capturing early deviations and underlying causes of accidents in a more proactive fashion. However, the comparison of the two techniques performed in this chapter shows that they both possess reactive and proactive traits to some extent. Moreover, despite the fact that they may show little complementarity, their overlapping may be useful for (partial) mutual validation.
2016
Dynamic Risk Analysis in the Chemical and Petroleum Industry: Evolution and Interaction with Parallel Disciplines in the Perspective of Industrial Application
93
101
Scarponi G.E., Paltrinieri N. (2016). Comparison and Complementarity between Reactive and Proactive Approaches. Oxford : Elsevier Inc. [10.1016/B978-0-12-803765-2.00008-1].
Scarponi G.E.; Paltrinieri N.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/959184
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact