In order to compare the methodological aspects of the different projects, while also placing them within a common framework, a form was specially drafted. This form was filled out in May 2019 by one or more members of each work group (Ascoli Piceno, Bologna, Milano, Roma, Trieste). The form was divided into three different sections (“Context characterisation methods”; “Community involvement methods”; “Networking methods”). Each section was created in order to highlight multidisciplinary aspects, the collaboration among different roles, and the problems and limitations the could have been faced. The sections differ in their design, although a common scheme was used in nearly all parts: narrative description, players, actions, instruments and sources. Consequently, all projects were therefore analysed according to the following matrix. Considering the specificity of the Recovery-Net project, this project was analysed solely for context characterisation methods.

Salvatori L.M., Marceca M., Paglione L., Angelozzi A., Caminada S., Errigo M., et al. (2020). Methodological comparison of different projects. Berlino : Springer [10.1007/978-3-030-49446-9_16].

Methodological comparison of different projects

Battisti A.;Bodini C.;D'Onofrio R.;Sgro C.;
2020

Abstract

In order to compare the methodological aspects of the different projects, while also placing them within a common framework, a form was specially drafted. This form was filled out in May 2019 by one or more members of each work group (Ascoli Piceno, Bologna, Milano, Roma, Trieste). The form was divided into three different sections (“Context characterisation methods”; “Community involvement methods”; “Networking methods”). Each section was created in order to highlight multidisciplinary aspects, the collaboration among different roles, and the problems and limitations the could have been faced. The sections differ in their design, although a common scheme was used in nearly all parts: narrative description, players, actions, instruments and sources. Consequently, all projects were therefore analysed according to the following matrix. Considering the specificity of the Recovery-Net project, this project was analysed solely for context characterisation methods.
2020
Urban Health
225
260
Salvatori L.M., Marceca M., Paglione L., Angelozzi A., Caminada S., Errigo M., et al. (2020). Methodological comparison of different projects. Berlino : Springer [10.1007/978-3-030-49446-9_16].
Salvatori L.M.; Marceca M.; Paglione L.; Angelozzi A.; Caminada S.; Errigo M.; Tofani M.; Battisti A.; Barnocchi A.; Bodini C.; Riccio M.; Maralla R.;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/920382
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact