A number of lines of research were launched as part of the PhD in Architecture that analysed four post-war case studies selected from the reconstruction projects developed by the architect Josef Wie- demann in Munich. Among the possible lines of research, one of the most promising seems to be the study of the evolution of the cultural relationship that developed between Italy and Germany from the 1930s to the post-war period as regards the issue of monument restoration. The research carried out as part of the PhD showed that the architect Josef Wiedemann, one of the most prominent figures in Munich’s reconstruction programme, had a thorough understanding of Italian restoration discus- sions and improvements. In the method he gradually perfected whilst working on damaged monu- ments at first hand, his interest in the Italian debate is palpable. One example is the reconstruction of the Siegestor (Munich’s Victory Gate, 1956-1958) – undoubtedly one of the most important projects that contributed to the development of his method of reconstruction – which reveals the influence of what had been declared in the Charter of Athens (1931) and the Italian Charter (1932): from the ‘judicious’ use of modern techniques to the conservation of ruins and the recognisable nature of new repairs, all concepts that had been envisaged in the Charters. His later writings, produced when his professional approach was well established, confirm the careful attention he paid to the Italian de- bate. He refers to the Charter of Venice (1964) as a guideline that should be adopted when tackling monuments, particularly as regards the concept of authenticity. It is clear, therefore, that the cultural relationship between Italy and Germany began well before the appearance of the tragic landscape left behind by the Second World War. The way these two cultures studied each other is evident in their ar- chitectural works, literature and scientific publications. As this paper will show, all these aspects inspire us to ask: when did the cultural dialogue that animated these two countries fall apart? This paper acts as a premise for a more in-depth examination of the differences between current Italian and German results in the field of restoration – both theoretical and practica

Un confronto tra prassi e teoria nel restauro tra Italia e Germania. Dalla Carta di Atene alla Carta di Venezia / Leila Signorelli. - STAMPA. - (2017), pp. 295-302.

Un confronto tra prassi e teoria nel restauro tra Italia e Germania. Dalla Carta di Atene alla Carta di Venezia

Leila Signorelli
2017

Abstract

A number of lines of research were launched as part of the PhD in Architecture that analysed four post-war case studies selected from the reconstruction projects developed by the architect Josef Wie- demann in Munich. Among the possible lines of research, one of the most promising seems to be the study of the evolution of the cultural relationship that developed between Italy and Germany from the 1930s to the post-war period as regards the issue of monument restoration. The research carried out as part of the PhD showed that the architect Josef Wiedemann, one of the most prominent figures in Munich’s reconstruction programme, had a thorough understanding of Italian restoration discus- sions and improvements. In the method he gradually perfected whilst working on damaged monu- ments at first hand, his interest in the Italian debate is palpable. One example is the reconstruction of the Siegestor (Munich’s Victory Gate, 1956-1958) – undoubtedly one of the most important projects that contributed to the development of his method of reconstruction – which reveals the influence of what had been declared in the Charter of Athens (1931) and the Italian Charter (1932): from the ‘judicious’ use of modern techniques to the conservation of ruins and the recognisable nature of new repairs, all concepts that had been envisaged in the Charters. His later writings, produced when his professional approach was well established, confirm the careful attention he paid to the Italian de- bate. He refers to the Charter of Venice (1964) as a guideline that should be adopted when tackling monuments, particularly as regards the concept of authenticity. It is clear, therefore, that the cultural relationship between Italy and Germany began well before the appearance of the tragic landscape left behind by the Second World War. The way these two cultures studied each other is evident in their ar- chitectural works, literature and scientific publications. As this paper will show, all these aspects inspire us to ask: when did the cultural dialogue that animated these two countries fall apart? This paper acts as a premise for a more in-depth examination of the differences between current Italian and German results in the field of restoration – both theoretical and practica
2017
RICerca/REStauro
295
302
Un confronto tra prassi e teoria nel restauro tra Italia e Germania. Dalla Carta di Atene alla Carta di Venezia / Leila Signorelli. - STAMPA. - (2017), pp. 295-302.
Leila Signorelli
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/911226
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact