Current citation practices observed in articles are very noisy, confusing, and not standardised, making identifying the cited works problematic for humans and any reference extraction software. In this work, we want to investigate such citation practices for referencing different types of entities and, in particular, to understand the most used metadata in bibliographic references. We identified 36 types of cited entities (the most cited ones were articles, books, and proceeding papers) within the 34,140 bibliographic references extracted from a vast set of journal articles on 27 different subject areas. The analysis of such bibliographic references, grouped by the particular type of cited entities, enabled us to highlight the most used metadata for defining bibliographic references across the subject areas. However, we also noticed that, in some cases, bibliographic references did not provide the essential elements to identify the work they refer to easily.

dos Santos, E.A., Peroni, S., Mucheroni, M.L. (2022). The Way We Cite: Common Metadata Used Across Disciplines for Defining Bibliographic References. GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND : SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG [10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_10].

The Way We Cite: Common Metadata Used Across Disciplines for Defining Bibliographic References

Peroni, S;
2022

Abstract

Current citation practices observed in articles are very noisy, confusing, and not standardised, making identifying the cited works problematic for humans and any reference extraction software. In this work, we want to investigate such citation practices for referencing different types of entities and, in particular, to understand the most used metadata in bibliographic references. We identified 36 types of cited entities (the most cited ones were articles, books, and proceeding papers) within the 34,140 bibliographic references extracted from a vast set of journal articles on 27 different subject areas. The analysis of such bibliographic references, grouped by the particular type of cited entities, enabled us to highlight the most used metadata for defining bibliographic references across the subject areas. However, we also noticed that, in some cases, bibliographic references did not provide the essential elements to identify the work they refer to easily.
2022
Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries - 26th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2022, Padua, Italy, September 20–23, 2022, Proceedings
120
132
dos Santos, E.A., Peroni, S., Mucheroni, M.L. (2022). The Way We Cite: Common Metadata Used Across Disciplines for Defining Bibliographic References. GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND : SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG [10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_10].
dos Santos, EA; Peroni, S; Mucheroni, ML
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dos_Santos_Peroni_postprint.pdf

Open Access dal 16/09/2023

Descrizione: Capitolo
Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 839.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
839.54 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/902040
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact