Within the debate on temporary organisation (Lundin and Söderholm, 1995; Bakker et al. 2016), recent studies have explored the relationship between temporary and permanent organising, focusing on coordination and emerging tensions (i.e. Stjerne and Svejenova, 2016). Understanding the outcomes of this relationship is particularly important when a temporary organisational structure is employed to solve a crisis affecting a permanent organisation, as it happens with the practice of commissariamento within the Italian public administration.
TEMPORARY ORGANISATIONS AND CRISES: A CRITICAL REFLECTION ON THE PRACTICE OF COMMISSARIAMENTO
Ferri Paolo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2020
Abstract
Within the debate on temporary organisation (Lundin and Söderholm, 1995; Bakker et al. 2016), recent studies have explored the relationship between temporary and permanent organising, focusing on coordination and emerging tensions (i.e. Stjerne and Svejenova, 2016). Understanding the outcomes of this relationship is particularly important when a temporary organisational structure is employed to solve a crisis affecting a permanent organisation, as it happens with the practice of commissariamento within the Italian public administration.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
