1. Introduction. 2. The Transcendental Interpretation of the Claim-to-correctness Thesis. 3. Claim to Correctness and Degree of Pragmatic Contradictoriness. 4. The Claim to Correctness, Performative Contradictions, and Brandom's Theory of Practical Reason. 5. Inferentialism, Social Practices and Practical Disagreements. 5.1. Inferential Disagreements. 5.2. Practical Disagreements. 6. Conclusion.
G. Bongiovanni, A. Rotolo, C. Roversi (2009). Inferentialism, Social Practices, and the Connection between Law and Morality. MILANO : EGEA.
Inferentialism, Social Practices, and the Connection between Law and Morality
BONGIOVANNI, GIORGIO;ROTOLO, ANTONINO;ROVERSI, CORRADO
2009
Abstract
1. Introduction. 2. The Transcendental Interpretation of the Claim-to-correctness Thesis. 3. Claim to Correctness and Degree of Pragmatic Contradictoriness. 4. The Claim to Correctness, Performative Contradictions, and Brandom's Theory of Practical Reason. 5. Inferentialism, Social Practices and Practical Disagreements. 5.1. Inferential Disagreements. 5.2. Practical Disagreements. 6. Conclusion.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
