This book argues that leaders of hybrid regimes in pursuit of polit- ical domination and material gain instrumentalize both hidden forms of corruption and public anti-corruption policies. Corruption is pursued for different purposes including cooperation with stra- tegic partners and exclusion of opponents. Presidents use anti-cor- ruption policies to legitimize and institutionalize political domina- tion. Corrupt practices and anti-corruption policies become two sides of the same coin and are exercised to maintain an uneven po- litical playing field. This study combines empirical analysis and social constructiv- ism for an investigation into the presidencies of Leonid Kuchma (1994–2005), Viktor Yushchenko (2005–2010) and Viktor Yanu- kovych (2010–2014). Explorative expert interviews, press surveys, content analysis of presidential speeches, as well as critical assess- ment of anti-corruption legislation, provide data for comparison and process tracing of the utilization of corruption under three Ukrainian presidents.

How corruption and anti-corruption policies sustain hybrid regimes. strategies of political domination under Ukraine’s presidents in 1994-2014

Oksana Huss
Primo
2020

Abstract

This book argues that leaders of hybrid regimes in pursuit of polit- ical domination and material gain instrumentalize both hidden forms of corruption and public anti-corruption policies. Corruption is pursued for different purposes including cooperation with stra- tegic partners and exclusion of opponents. Presidents use anti-cor- ruption policies to legitimize and institutionalize political domina- tion. Corrupt practices and anti-corruption policies become two sides of the same coin and are exercised to maintain an uneven po- litical playing field. This study combines empirical analysis and social constructiv- ism for an investigation into the presidencies of Leonid Kuchma (1994–2005), Viktor Yushchenko (2005–2010) and Viktor Yanu- kovych (2010–2014). Explorative expert interviews, press surveys, content analysis of presidential speeches, as well as critical assess- ment of anti-corruption legislation, provide data for comparison and process tracing of the utilization of corruption under three Ukrainian presidents.
2020
403
978-3-8382-1430-6
Oksana Huss
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/810253
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact