The response of the EU Migration System of Governance (EUMSG) has been characterized not only by a renewed lack of internal solidarity among Member States, unable to agree to take on shared responsibilities, but also by collective reactions which have led to three main outcomes with consequences that cast a shadow on the EU’s long-term self-representation as a principled actor: “paralysis”, “bordering” and “externalization”. The process that has led to these results has been effectively explored as “the securitization of Schengen”, that is, an attempt by EU institutions to save Schengen from increasingly frequent and uncoordinated suspension by Member States in late 2015 to stop secondary movements towards their countries. What has been less studied is the context—political, historical and institutional—within which Member States’ responses were conceived. In this chapter we explore the norms and practices regarding migration of a sample of countries in the EU Migration System of Governance as well their embedded justice claims.
Fassi, E., Lucarelli, S. (2021). The EU Migration System and Global Justice: An Assessment. London : Palgrave MacMillan [10.1007/978-3-030-53997-9_10].
The EU Migration System and Global Justice: An Assessment
Fassi, EnricoCo-primo
;Lucarelli, SoniaCo-primo
2021
Abstract
The response of the EU Migration System of Governance (EUMSG) has been characterized not only by a renewed lack of internal solidarity among Member States, unable to agree to take on shared responsibilities, but also by collective reactions which have led to three main outcomes with consequences that cast a shadow on the EU’s long-term self-representation as a principled actor: “paralysis”, “bordering” and “externalization”. The process that has led to these results has been effectively explored as “the securitization of Schengen”, that is, an attempt by EU institutions to save Schengen from increasingly frequent and uncoordinated suspension by Member States in late 2015 to stop secondary movements towards their countries. What has been less studied is the context—political, historical and institutional—within which Member States’ responses were conceived. In this chapter we explore the norms and practices regarding migration of a sample of countries in the EU Migration System of Governance as well their embedded justice claims.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
