Grammaticalization parameters and the retrieval of alternatives: Latin nec from discourse connector to uninterpretable feature

By means of the study of Latin focus-sensitive negation nec (‘furthermore not’; ‘nei- ther’; ‘not even’), I address a more general question on the scope and the cyclicity of semantic change. I review Lehmann’s syntagmatic parameters of grammatical- ization (structural scope, bondedness, syntagmatic variability) with the aim of eval- uating to what extent they are reflected in some types of semantic change. With nec we see the evolution, from Latin to Romance, of a discourse-structuring parti- cle with an additive component into the building block of new emphatic (scalar) negative polarity items, which in turn are later reanalyzed as elements of Negative Concord (endowed with uninterpretable formal features). I argue that an impor- tant aspect of this change concerns the way alternatives to the focused element are retrieved in the context. I propose that increase in bondedness and decrease in syntagmatic variability correlate with a change in the form taken by alternatives, which decrease in scope from discourse units to individual alternatives.