Under the principle of conferral, the EU can act only within the limits of the competences conferred upon it to attain the objectives set out in the Treaties. Each Union measure must consequently be founded on a Treaty provision – the “legal basis” – that enables the Union to act in order to pursue a specific objective. EU Treaties provide for numerous legal bases, which relate to different policies and provide for different decision-making procedures. To determine the correct legal basis of a measure, one should apply the so-called “centre of gravity” doctrine, whereby the choice of the legal basis act must rest on objective factors amenable to judicial review, which include the aim and content of that measure. Yet, given the functional overlap between EU policies, it is sometimes difficult to identify the correct legal basis of a Union act. The selection of either an AFSJ or CFSP legal basis, in particular, may raise constitutional issues, in terms of the principles of conferral of competences and institutional balance. This paper analyses the ECJ case law on AFSJ/CFSP delimitation, distilling the elements that, according to the Court, may allow EU institutions to properly identify the legal bases of security-related acts. The analysis also elucidates the pitfalls in the reasoning of the Court, and suggests alternative solutions that might increase legal clarity.

Mauro Gatti (2018). Conflict of Legal Bases and the Internal-External Security Nexus: AFSJ versus CFSP. Baden Baden : Nomos.

Conflict of Legal Bases and the Internal-External Security Nexus: AFSJ versus CFSP

Mauro Gatti
2018

Abstract

Under the principle of conferral, the EU can act only within the limits of the competences conferred upon it to attain the objectives set out in the Treaties. Each Union measure must consequently be founded on a Treaty provision – the “legal basis” – that enables the Union to act in order to pursue a specific objective. EU Treaties provide for numerous legal bases, which relate to different policies and provide for different decision-making procedures. To determine the correct legal basis of a measure, one should apply the so-called “centre of gravity” doctrine, whereby the choice of the legal basis act must rest on objective factors amenable to judicial review, which include the aim and content of that measure. Yet, given the functional overlap between EU policies, it is sometimes difficult to identify the correct legal basis of a Union act. The selection of either an AFSJ or CFSP legal basis, in particular, may raise constitutional issues, in terms of the principles of conferral of competences and institutional balance. This paper analyses the ECJ case law on AFSJ/CFSP delimitation, distilling the elements that, according to the Court, may allow EU institutions to properly identify the legal bases of security-related acts. The analysis also elucidates the pitfalls in the reasoning of the Court, and suggests alternative solutions that might increase legal clarity.
2018
Constitutional Issues of EU External Relations Law
87
107
Mauro Gatti (2018). Conflict of Legal Bases and the Internal-External Security Nexus: AFSJ versus CFSP. Baden Baden : Nomos.
Mauro Gatti
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/727522
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact