The chapter explores some conceptual issues related to changing forms of urban social control and policing with a focus on Italian cities, and in a comparative perspective. It relies upon a number of different theoretical perspectives, particularly those that focus on dynamics of state’s sovereignty and re-distribution of powers (Garland (1996, 2001) on how governance unfolds at the local level (Crawford, 1999; Johnston and Shearing 2003), including recent integrations of the idea of governance offered by “regime analysis” (Edwards and Hughes, 2012), combined with theories of urban social control and pluralization of policing (Beckett and Herbert 2008; Crawford 2006; Jones and Newburn 2006). The analysis is based on a comparative perspective, aimed at singling out how ideas, concepts, practices and policies recur in different contexts and how they are adopted – or not – in different places or times. The “adoption process” implies also an “adaptation,” i.e. that the local context reshapes those flows according to its own specific needs and interests (Newburn and Sparks, 2004). This process of adaptation is the result of many structural and cultural factors, and, starting from a convergent “global” dynamic characterized by homogeneization, gives rise to local – sometimes quite important - divergences in the development of the new forms of governance of local security policies and policing.

Urban policing in Italy: Some reflections in a comparative perspective / Rossella Selmini. - STAMPA. - (2017), pp. 167-181.

Urban policing in Italy: Some reflections in a comparative perspective

Rossella Selmini
2017

Abstract

The chapter explores some conceptual issues related to changing forms of urban social control and policing with a focus on Italian cities, and in a comparative perspective. It relies upon a number of different theoretical perspectives, particularly those that focus on dynamics of state’s sovereignty and re-distribution of powers (Garland (1996, 2001) on how governance unfolds at the local level (Crawford, 1999; Johnston and Shearing 2003), including recent integrations of the idea of governance offered by “regime analysis” (Edwards and Hughes, 2012), combined with theories of urban social control and pluralization of policing (Beckett and Herbert 2008; Crawford 2006; Jones and Newburn 2006). The analysis is based on a comparative perspective, aimed at singling out how ideas, concepts, practices and policies recur in different contexts and how they are adopted – or not – in different places or times. The “adoption process” implies also an “adaptation,” i.e. that the local context reshapes those flows according to its own specific needs and interests (Newburn and Sparks, 2004). This process of adaptation is the result of many structural and cultural factors, and, starting from a convergent “global” dynamic characterized by homogeneization, gives rise to local – sometimes quite important - divergences in the development of the new forms of governance of local security policies and policing.
2017
Policing European metropolises. The policy of security in city-regions
167
181
Urban policing in Italy: Some reflections in a comparative perspective / Rossella Selmini. - STAMPA. - (2017), pp. 167-181.
Rossella Selmini
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/706795
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact