Democratic societies base much of their decisions on voting procedures that involve aggregation of individual votes into a winning solution. While for two candidates majority voting can provide satisfactory results, for three or more candidates the winner depends on the voting method employed. In this chapter we analyse preferential voting, where voting ballots consist of a ranking of candidates. We first study the classical Condorcet criterium introduced to maximise the total satisfaction of voters, i.e. the utilitarian criterion. We then complement it with a recently introduced method to minimise the total un-evenness of the rewards, i.e. the egalitarian dimension. We show, through targeted examples and analysis of synthetic vote data, that the new dimension may lead to more fair results, and can provide resilience to radical voter opinions.

Contucci, P., Sîrbu, A. (2019). Egalitarianism vs. Utilitarianism in preferential voting. Berlin : Springer Verlag [10.1007/978-3-030-05333-8_3].

Egalitarianism vs. Utilitarianism in preferential voting

Contucci, Pierluigi;Sîrbu, Alina
2019

Abstract

Democratic societies base much of their decisions on voting procedures that involve aggregation of individual votes into a winning solution. While for two candidates majority voting can provide satisfactory results, for three or more candidates the winner depends on the voting method employed. In this chapter we analyse preferential voting, where voting ballots consist of a ranking of candidates. We first study the classical Condorcet criterium introduced to maximise the total satisfaction of voters, i.e. the utilitarian criterion. We then complement it with a recently introduced method to minimise the total un-evenness of the rewards, i.e. the egalitarian dimension. We show, through targeted examples and analysis of synthetic vote data, that the new dimension may lead to more fair results, and can provide resilience to radical voter opinions.
2019
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
24
37
Contucci, P., Sîrbu, A. (2019). Egalitarianism vs. Utilitarianism in preferential voting. Berlin : Springer Verlag [10.1007/978-3-030-05333-8_3].
Contucci, Pierluigi*; Sîrbu, Alina
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/653864
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact