Risk sociologists consider risks in contemporary society to be global, interconnected, and in large part unpredictable. According to Beck, the globalization of risks implies that individuals are exposed to the same level of risk (democratization of risks). On the other hand, the environmental justice perspective, though acknowledging the centrality of risk, underlines the correlation between socio-economic inequalities and exposure to air pollution. Also, deprived people are more vulnerable to air pollution because they often have worse health conditions compared with the upper class. Promoting the involvement of lay people in research, the environmental justice perspective proposes a ‘popular epidemiology’ in contrast with the dominant trends in epidemiological perspective. Moreover, for them individual interventions based on lifestyles changes are desirable but cannot solve the problem of health threats caused by air pollution. Sociology can provide a theoretical framework, evidence from empirical research and data for both institutional forms of prevention and social mobilization against sources of pollution.

Maturo A., M.V. (2018). Sociological Theories on Air Pollution: Between Environmental Justice and the Risk Society Approach. Berlin : Springer [10.1007/978-3-319-62731-1].

Sociological Theories on Air Pollution: Between Environmental Justice and the Risk Society Approach

Maturo A.;Moretti V.
2018

Abstract

Risk sociologists consider risks in contemporary society to be global, interconnected, and in large part unpredictable. According to Beck, the globalization of risks implies that individuals are exposed to the same level of risk (democratization of risks). On the other hand, the environmental justice perspective, though acknowledging the centrality of risk, underlines the correlation between socio-economic inequalities and exposure to air pollution. Also, deprived people are more vulnerable to air pollution because they often have worse health conditions compared with the upper class. Promoting the involvement of lay people in research, the environmental justice perspective proposes a ‘popular epidemiology’ in contrast with the dominant trends in epidemiological perspective. Moreover, for them individual interventions based on lifestyles changes are desirable but cannot solve the problem of health threats caused by air pollution. Sociology can provide a theoretical framework, evidence from empirical research and data for both institutional forms of prevention and social mobilization against sources of pollution.
2018
Clinical Handbook of Air Pollution-Related Diseases
603
620
Maturo A., M.V. (2018). Sociological Theories on Air Pollution: Between Environmental Justice and the Risk Society Approach. Berlin : Springer [10.1007/978-3-319-62731-1].
Maturo A., Moretti V.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/635920
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact