The paper provides a logical and philosophical analysis of Leibniz’s “presumptive” proof of Gods’ existence. In particular it stresses the close analogy between Leibniz’s method of argument and the kind of inference rules articulated by current nonmonotonic logics (e.g. default logic).
Defeasibility and God's Existence
ARTOSI, ALBERTO
2016
Abstract
The paper provides a logical and philosophical analysis of Leibniz’s “presumptive” proof of Gods’ existence. In particular it stresses the close analogy between Leibniz’s method of argument and the kind of inference rules articulated by current nonmonotonic logics (e.g. default logic).File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
