As part of a study on the impact of the Set Adise measure (2000-2006), this evaluation question investigates about the effects of compulsory set aside on the costs sustained by Member States for the functioning of the Integrated Administration and Control System, which oversees the implementation of the CAP direct support scheme. The judgment criteria of the analysis are based on a counterfactual hypothesis of no set aside obligations.
Canali M. (2008). Chapter 24 - To what extent did the administration and control requirements due to Set Aside increase the costs of implementation of the direct support scheme?. BRUXELLES : The European Commission - DG AGRI.
Chapter 24 - To what extent did the administration and control requirements due to Set Aside increase the costs of implementation of the direct support scheme?
CANALI, MASSIMO
2008
Abstract
As part of a study on the impact of the Set Adise measure (2000-2006), this evaluation question investigates about the effects of compulsory set aside on the costs sustained by Member States for the functioning of the Integrated Administration and Control System, which oversees the implementation of the CAP direct support scheme. The judgment criteria of the analysis are based on a counterfactual hypothesis of no set aside obligations.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
