In strategic argumentation players exchange arguments to prove or reject a claim. This paper discusses and reports on research about two basic issues regarding the game-theoretic understanding of strategic argumentation games in the law: whether such games can be reasonably modelled as zero-sum games and as games with complete information.

Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Rotolo, A., Scannapieco, S., Sartor, G. (2014). Two faces of strategic argumentation in the law. Amsterdam : IOS [10.3233/978-1-61499-468-8-81].

Two faces of strategic argumentation in the law

GOVERNATORI, GUIDO;OLIVIERI, FRANCESCO;ROTOLO, ANTONINO;SARTOR, GIOVANNI
2014

Abstract

In strategic argumentation players exchange arguments to prove or reject a claim. This paper discusses and reports on research about two basic issues regarding the game-theoretic understanding of strategic argumentation games in the law: whether such games can be reasonably modelled as zero-sum games and as games with complete information.
2014
Legal Knowledge and Information System: Jurix-2014.
81
90
Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Rotolo, A., Scannapieco, S., Sartor, G. (2014). Two faces of strategic argumentation in the law. Amsterdam : IOS [10.3233/978-1-61499-468-8-81].
Governatori, Guido; Olivieri, Francesco; Rotolo, Antonino; Scannapieco, Simone; Sartor, Giovanni
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/523527
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact