Sentences are special cases of abductive reasoning, that become normative interpretations. When they refer to a supposed “hard core” of the norm (as in the judgment of the Constitutional Court n. 138/2010), they actually fall into a semanticinterpretative contradiction, denying the same encyclopedic-interpretative model (as such sensitive to context and socio-cultural frame) on which they prove to be founded.
Sentences are special cases of abductive reasoning, that become normative interpretations. When they refer to a supposed “hard core” of the norm (as in the judgment of the Constitutional Court n. 138/2010), they actually fall into a semanticinterpretative contradiction, denying the same encyclopedic-interpretative model (as such sensitive to context and socio-cultural frame) on which they prove to be founded.
Anna Maria, L. (2015). Percorsi semantici e pratiche interpretative: su alcuni usi degli artt.2 e 29 della Costituzione. Torino : Giappichelli Editore.
Percorsi semantici e pratiche interpretative: su alcuni usi degli artt.2 e 29 della Costituzione
LORUSSO, ANNA MARIA
2015
Abstract
Sentences are special cases of abductive reasoning, that become normative interpretations. When they refer to a supposed “hard core” of the norm (as in the judgment of the Constitutional Court n. 138/2010), they actually fall into a semanticinterpretative contradiction, denying the same encyclopedic-interpretative model (as such sensitive to context and socio-cultural frame) on which they prove to be founded.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
