“Enfacement” occurs when participants incorporate another’s face into their self-face representation after observing that face touched repeatedly in synchrony with touch felt on their own face (Sforza et al., 2010; Tsakiris, 2008). The degree of assimilation of the other’s face is positively correlated with participants’ trait-level empathy scores (Sforza et al., 2010) and affects judgments of the other’s personality (Paladino et al., 2010), suggesting that enfacement also modulates higher-order representations of “self” and “other” involved in social and emotional evaluations. To test this hypothesis, we varied not only whether visuo-tactile stimulation was synchronous or asynchronous but also whether the person being touched in the video displayed an emotional expression indicative of threat, either fear or anger. We hypothesized that participants would incorporate the faces of fearful others more than the faces of angry others after interpersonal multisensory stimulation because the sight of fear carries more relevant information for adaptive behavior (Pichon et al., 2009). Instead, we found that the enfacement effect (i.e. greater incorporation of the other’s face following synchronous compared to asynchronous visuo-tactile stimulation) was abolished if the other person expressed fear but remained if she appeared angry. This nonetheless suggests that enfacement operates on an evaluative self-representation as well as a physical one because the effect changes with the emotional content of the other’s face. Further research into the neural mechanism behind the enfacement effect is needed to determine why the sight of fear diminishes it rather than enhancing it.
Interpersonal multisensory stimulation and emotion: The impact of threat-indicative facial expressions on enfacement
BECK, BRIANNA COLETTE;BERTINI, CATERINA;LADAVAS, ELISABETTA
2012
Abstract
“Enfacement” occurs when participants incorporate another’s face into their self-face representation after observing that face touched repeatedly in synchrony with touch felt on their own face (Sforza et al., 2010; Tsakiris, 2008). The degree of assimilation of the other’s face is positively correlated with participants’ trait-level empathy scores (Sforza et al., 2010) and affects judgments of the other’s personality (Paladino et al., 2010), suggesting that enfacement also modulates higher-order representations of “self” and “other” involved in social and emotional evaluations. To test this hypothesis, we varied not only whether visuo-tactile stimulation was synchronous or asynchronous but also whether the person being touched in the video displayed an emotional expression indicative of threat, either fear or anger. We hypothesized that participants would incorporate the faces of fearful others more than the faces of angry others after interpersonal multisensory stimulation because the sight of fear carries more relevant information for adaptive behavior (Pichon et al., 2009). Instead, we found that the enfacement effect (i.e. greater incorporation of the other’s face following synchronous compared to asynchronous visuo-tactile stimulation) was abolished if the other person expressed fear but remained if she appeared angry. This nonetheless suggests that enfacement operates on an evaluative self-representation as well as a physical one because the effect changes with the emotional content of the other’s face. Further research into the neural mechanism behind the enfacement effect is needed to determine why the sight of fear diminishes it rather than enhancing it.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
