In this paper I have first taken into account the relationship between the Rhetoric to Alexander and the Rhetoric of Aristotle. After stressing the peculiarities of the two works I have called attention on some of the pisteis, which Aristotle calls 'entechnoi' and I have examined the logical process which leeds the hearer to persuasion. One after the other 'eikos', 'paradeigma', 'tekmerion', 'enthymeme' are discussed in relationship to the notions of 'probability', frequency and contrariety.

“Argumentative Devices in the Rhetorica ad Alexandrum” / L.Montefusco. - STAMPA. - (2006), pp. 105-121.

“Argumentative Devices in the Rhetorica ad Alexandrum”

MONTEFUSCO, LUCIA
2006

Abstract

In this paper I have first taken into account the relationship between the Rhetoric to Alexander and the Rhetoric of Aristotle. After stressing the peculiarities of the two works I have called attention on some of the pisteis, which Aristotle calls 'entechnoi' and I have examined the logical process which leeds the hearer to persuasion. One after the other 'eikos', 'paradeigma', 'tekmerion', 'enthymeme' are discussed in relationship to the notions of 'probability', frequency and contrariety.
2006
Influences on Peripatetic Rhetoric
105
121
“Argumentative Devices in the Rhetorica ad Alexandrum” / L.Montefusco. - STAMPA. - (2006), pp. 105-121.
L.Montefusco
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/36276
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact