Objective/Background: The HAM-D-17 Anxiety/Somatization factor includes six items: Anxiety (psychic), Anxiety (somatic), Somatic Symptoms (G.I.), Somatic Symptoms (general), Hypochondriasis, and Insight. This study examines the relationship between early changes (defined as baseline to week 1) in these HAM-D-17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor items and treatment outcome among major depressive disorder (MDD) patients participating in a study comparing the antidepressant efficacy of a standardized extract of hypericum with both placebo and fluoxetine. Methods: Following a 1-week, single-blind wash-out, patients with MDD diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with hypericum extract (900 mg/day), fluoxetine (20 mg/day), or placebo. The 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) was the primary efficacy measure. The ability of early changes in HAM-D-17 anxiety/somatization factor items to predict treatment outcome were assessed separately for patients who received active treatment (hypericum or fluoxetine) versus placebo with a logistic regression method. Results: 135 patients (57% women, mean age = 37.3 + 11.0; mean baseline HAM-D-17 = 19.7 +3.2) were randomized to double-blind treatment and were included in the intent-to-treat analyses. The remission rates were 38% in the hypericum group, 30% in the fluoxetine group, and 21% in the placebo group. After adjusting for baseline HAM-D-17 scores and for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni correction, patients who remitted (HAM-D-17 <8) after active treatment had significantly greater improvement in Somatic Symptoms (General) scores than non-remitters. No other significant differences in early changes were noted for the remaining items between remitters versus non-remitters who received active treatment. For patients treated with placebo, early change was not predictive of remission for any of the items. Conclusion: The presence of early improvement on the HAM-D-17 item concerning fatigue and general somatic symptoms was significantly predictive of achieving remission at endpoint with active treatment but not with placebo.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EARLY CHANGES IN THE HAMD-17 ANXIETY/SOMATIZATION FACTOR ITEMS AND TREATMENT OUTCOME AMONG DEPRESSED OUTPATIENTS

TOSSANI, ELIANA;
2004

Abstract

Objective/Background: The HAM-D-17 Anxiety/Somatization factor includes six items: Anxiety (psychic), Anxiety (somatic), Somatic Symptoms (G.I.), Somatic Symptoms (general), Hypochondriasis, and Insight. This study examines the relationship between early changes (defined as baseline to week 1) in these HAM-D-17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor items and treatment outcome among major depressive disorder (MDD) patients participating in a study comparing the antidepressant efficacy of a standardized extract of hypericum with both placebo and fluoxetine. Methods: Following a 1-week, single-blind wash-out, patients with MDD diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with hypericum extract (900 mg/day), fluoxetine (20 mg/day), or placebo. The 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) was the primary efficacy measure. The ability of early changes in HAM-D-17 anxiety/somatization factor items to predict treatment outcome were assessed separately for patients who received active treatment (hypericum or fluoxetine) versus placebo with a logistic regression method. Results: 135 patients (57% women, mean age = 37.3 + 11.0; mean baseline HAM-D-17 = 19.7 +3.2) were randomized to double-blind treatment and were included in the intent-to-treat analyses. The remission rates were 38% in the hypericum group, 30% in the fluoxetine group, and 21% in the placebo group. After adjusting for baseline HAM-D-17 scores and for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni correction, patients who remitted (HAM-D-17 <8) after active treatment had significantly greater improvement in Somatic Symptoms (General) scores than non-remitters. No other significant differences in early changes were noted for the remaining items between remitters versus non-remitters who received active treatment. For patients treated with placebo, early change was not predictive of remission for any of the items. Conclusion: The presence of early improvement on the HAM-D-17 item concerning fatigue and general somatic symptoms was significantly predictive of achieving remission at endpoint with active treatment but not with placebo.
2004
Annual New Clinical Drug Evaluation (NCDEU) Meeting
A. H. Farabaugh; D. Mischoulon; M. Fava; S. Wu; T. Petersen; A. Mascarini; E. Tossani; J. Alpert
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/27072
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact