In traditional open surgery several ways of approach have been advocated to access the retrourethral space and remove utriclular cyst (also called müllerian duct remnants, MDR): a) perineal; b) retropubic or sovrapubic extravesical; c) transvesical transtrigonal; d) transperitoneal; e) posterior sagittal transanorectal; f) anterior sagittal transanorectal (ASTRA); g) posterior perirectal or pararectal. [2,5,8,9] All these procedures are often technically challenging and have a potential risk of complications such as injury to pelvic nerve complex and anal sphincter, infections, incontinence and impotence; moreover, they require prolonged hospitalisation and cannot be completely resolving [6,7]. The use of laparoscopic technique obviates to these disadvantages because provides an optimal view, thanks to the imaging magnification, and permits to perform a fine dissection of MDR with an excellent exposition of all surrounding structure, with a minimal trauma on peritoneal cavity and a low incidence of postoperative adhesions. Mc Dougal [4] described in 1994 the use of laparoscopic approach to excise a MDR in a 48-year-old male patient with preservation of continence and potency. In 1998, we first successfully performed a laparoscopic removal of a MDR in a 15-year-old boy [3]. Successively we operated on five further boys with MDR In this chapter we present the laparoscopic procedure that we successfully performed in a series of six boys with MDR
Lima M, Aquino A, Domini M (2008). Laparoscopic treatment of utricular cysts. BERLINO : Springer [10.1007/978-3-540-49910-7_99].
Laparoscopic treatment of utricular cysts
LIMA, MARIO;DOMINI, MARCELLO
2008
Abstract
In traditional open surgery several ways of approach have been advocated to access the retrourethral space and remove utriclular cyst (also called müllerian duct remnants, MDR): a) perineal; b) retropubic or sovrapubic extravesical; c) transvesical transtrigonal; d) transperitoneal; e) posterior sagittal transanorectal; f) anterior sagittal transanorectal (ASTRA); g) posterior perirectal or pararectal. [2,5,8,9] All these procedures are often technically challenging and have a potential risk of complications such as injury to pelvic nerve complex and anal sphincter, infections, incontinence and impotence; moreover, they require prolonged hospitalisation and cannot be completely resolving [6,7]. The use of laparoscopic technique obviates to these disadvantages because provides an optimal view, thanks to the imaging magnification, and permits to perform a fine dissection of MDR with an excellent exposition of all surrounding structure, with a minimal trauma on peritoneal cavity and a low incidence of postoperative adhesions. Mc Dougal [4] described in 1994 the use of laparoscopic approach to excise a MDR in a 48-year-old male patient with preservation of continence and potency. In 1998, we first successfully performed a laparoscopic removal of a MDR in a 15-year-old boy [3]. Successively we operated on five further boys with MDR In this chapter we present the laparoscopic procedure that we successfully performed in a series of six boys with MDRI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


