The most recent clinical trials on adult acute lymphoid leukaemia (ALL) have shown complete remission and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 80-85% and 30-40%, respectively (Annino, et al, Durrant, et al, Kantarjian, et al, Larson, et al, Ribera, et al, Rowe). Intensified consolidation, particularly with high-dose methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine, may be one of the reasons for the improved outcome in recent series (Bassan and Hoelzer, Hoelzer and Gokbuget, Kebriaei and Larson). In addition, risk-adapted and subtype-oriented therapy may have contributed to this better outcome. However, the long term outcome of adult patients is still dismal, with approximately one third of the cases only being cured. At present, therapeutic options include conventional chemotherapy (CHT), high dose therapy with autologous and, especially, allogeneic stem cells transplantation (SCT) and, for certain subsets, such as BCR-ABL1+ ALL, specific targeted therapy (Piccaluga, et al). Although SCT has been used in adult ALL for more than 20 years, its role remains controversial as demonstrated by conflicting results in various studies. Previous casecontrolled studies did not show that allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) provided any advantage over CHT (Horowitz, et al, Zhang, et al) while in some studies there was an advantage, but restricted to young adults (Oh, et al). The number of controlled published or ongoing trials is remarkably small and some of them did not include both standard-risk and high-risk patients. Thus, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions from their results. In fact, while some authors did not report any differences between alloSCT and chemotherapy or autologous SCT (ASCT)(Gupta, et al, Labar, et al), others only found differences favouring allogeneic SCT in standard risk (Goldstone, et al) or high-risk ALL patients (Sebban, et al, Thiebaut, et al, Thomas, et al). In this chapter, the Authors reviewed data concerning alloSCT in adult ALL and discuss current controversial and possible perspectives.
P. Piccaluga, S Paolini, F Bonifazi, G Bandini, G Visani, S Giebel. (2012). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. RIJEKA : Intech.
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia
PICCALUGA, PIER PAOLO;PAOLINI, STEFANIA;
2012
Abstract
The most recent clinical trials on adult acute lymphoid leukaemia (ALL) have shown complete remission and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 80-85% and 30-40%, respectively (Annino, et al, Durrant, et al, Kantarjian, et al, Larson, et al, Ribera, et al, Rowe). Intensified consolidation, particularly with high-dose methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine, may be one of the reasons for the improved outcome in recent series (Bassan and Hoelzer, Hoelzer and Gokbuget, Kebriaei and Larson). In addition, risk-adapted and subtype-oriented therapy may have contributed to this better outcome. However, the long term outcome of adult patients is still dismal, with approximately one third of the cases only being cured. At present, therapeutic options include conventional chemotherapy (CHT), high dose therapy with autologous and, especially, allogeneic stem cells transplantation (SCT) and, for certain subsets, such as BCR-ABL1+ ALL, specific targeted therapy (Piccaluga, et al). Although SCT has been used in adult ALL for more than 20 years, its role remains controversial as demonstrated by conflicting results in various studies. Previous casecontrolled studies did not show that allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) provided any advantage over CHT (Horowitz, et al, Zhang, et al) while in some studies there was an advantage, but restricted to young adults (Oh, et al). The number of controlled published or ongoing trials is remarkably small and some of them did not include both standard-risk and high-risk patients. Thus, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions from their results. In fact, while some authors did not report any differences between alloSCT and chemotherapy or autologous SCT (ASCT)(Gupta, et al, Labar, et al), others only found differences favouring allogeneic SCT in standard risk (Goldstone, et al) or high-risk ALL patients (Sebban, et al, Thiebaut, et al, Thomas, et al). In this chapter, the Authors reviewed data concerning alloSCT in adult ALL and discuss current controversial and possible perspectives.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
