Effective implementation is essential if social policy is to deliver redistribution, protection and welfare enhancement, yet it remains a daunting task in a sector marked by intractable, highly political problems, marginal policy attention and heterogeneous delivery arrangements. This chapter takes stock of how the implementation and policy capacity literatures have conceptualised the resources and capacities required, identifying three successive perspectives. The first, "simplistic" view, structured by the top-down/bottom-up dichotomy, reduced capacity to compliance and fidelity — secured either through hierarchical control or through delegated discretion — relying mainly on regulatory resources and offering little systematic guidance on what capacity actually entails. The second, "comprehensive" view, built on Wu et al.'s (2015) policy capacity framework, treats capacity as a nested set of analytical, operational and political competences across individual, organisational and systemic levels, embraces a wider repertoire of policy instruments, and bridges design and implementation; its limits lie in an unresolved "capacity for whom" question and uneven sectoral and geographical coverage. The third, "nuanced" view stresses that capacity is sector- and task-specific and must operate in VUCA settings, where turbulence risks penalising the most vulnerable. The chapter concludes by advocating better policy design, stronger implementer capacities and further empirical research

Capano, G., Yan, Y. (2026). Capacity and resources for implementing social policy. Aldershot : Edward Elgar [10.4337/9781035331178.00018].

Capacity and resources for implementing social policy

Capano, Giliberto;
2026

Abstract

Effective implementation is essential if social policy is to deliver redistribution, protection and welfare enhancement, yet it remains a daunting task in a sector marked by intractable, highly political problems, marginal policy attention and heterogeneous delivery arrangements. This chapter takes stock of how the implementation and policy capacity literatures have conceptualised the resources and capacities required, identifying three successive perspectives. The first, "simplistic" view, structured by the top-down/bottom-up dichotomy, reduced capacity to compliance and fidelity — secured either through hierarchical control or through delegated discretion — relying mainly on regulatory resources and offering little systematic guidance on what capacity actually entails. The second, "comprehensive" view, built on Wu et al.'s (2015) policy capacity framework, treats capacity as a nested set of analytical, operational and political competences across individual, organisational and systemic levels, embraces a wider repertoire of policy instruments, and bridges design and implementation; its limits lie in an unresolved "capacity for whom" question and uneven sectoral and geographical coverage. The third, "nuanced" view stresses that capacity is sector- and task-specific and must operate in VUCA settings, where turbulence risks penalising the most vulnerable. The chapter concludes by advocating better policy design, stronger implementer capacities and further empirical research
2026
Handbook of Social Policy Implementation
112
129
Capano, G., Yan, Y. (2026). Capacity and resources for implementing social policy. Aldershot : Edward Elgar [10.4337/9781035331178.00018].
Capano, Giliberto; Yan, Yifei
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1079295
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact