This essay offers a critical overview of digital pedagogy, clarifying its status, dimensions, and educational implications. The author distinguishes between a pedagogy “of” the digital and a pedagogy “for” the digital, arguing that the digital should not be considered a separate domain, but rather a structural condition of contemporary experience that challenges the entire pedagogical field. The analysis is structured around three main dimensions: ontological-epistemological, didactic-methodological, and critical. At the ontological level, the digital is interpreted as a cultural environment that reshapes categories such as presence, relationship, and subjectivity, particularly in light of the transformations brought about by platforms, algorithms, and artificial intelligence. From a didactic perspective, the author warns against both uncritical adoption of technologies and technophobic resistance, advocating instead for their thoughtful integration within pedagogical models grounded in personalization, educational relationships, and experiential learning. From a critical standpoint, the essay highlights the risks of disintermediation, surveillance, and loss of autonomy, emphasizing the need for pedagogical discernment and responsibility. The contribution concludes by addressing emerging scenarios—especially those related to artificial intelligence—stressing the irreplaceable role of teachers, mediation, and the quality of educational relationships in preventing forms of self-instruction and ensuring that technological innovation remains oriented toward human development.
Il saggio propone una ricognizione critica della pedagogia del digitale, chiarendone statuto, dimensioni e implicazioni educative. L’autore distingue tra una pedagogia “del” digitale e una pedagogia “per” il digitale, sottolineando come il digitale non costituisca un ambito separato, ma una condizione strutturale dell’esperienza contemporanea che interpella l’intero campo pedagogico. La riflessione si articola su tre dimensioni principali: ontologico-epistemologica, didattico-metodologica e critica. Sul piano ontologico, il digitale viene letto come ambiente culturale e dispositivo di ridefinizione delle categorie di presenza, relazione e soggettività, anche alla luce delle trasformazioni indotte da piattaforme, algoritmi e intelligenza artificiale. Sul piano didattico, l’autore mette in guardia tanto dall’adozione acritica delle tecnologie quanto da posizioni di rifiuto, proponendo una loro integrazione consapevole entro modelli pedagogici fondati sulla personalizzazione, sulla relazione educativa e sulla centralità dell’esperienza. Sul piano critico, infine, si evidenziano i rischi di disintermediazione, sorveglianza e riduzione dell’autonomia, richiamando l’urgenza di un pensiero pedagogico capace di esercitare discernimento e responsabilità. Il contributo si chiude con una riflessione sugli scenari emergenti – in particolare rispetto all’uso dell’intelligenza artificiale – indicando nella funzione docente, nella mediazione e nella qualità della relazione educativa i presìdi irrinunciabili per evitare derive di autoistruzione e per garantire che l’innovazione tecnologica resti al servizio della crescita umana.
Rivoltella, P.C. (2025). La pedagogia (del) digitale. Figure, dinamiche, antropologia. Roma : LAS.
La pedagogia (del) digitale. Figure, dinamiche, antropologia
Pier Cesare Rivoltella
2025
Abstract
This essay offers a critical overview of digital pedagogy, clarifying its status, dimensions, and educational implications. The author distinguishes between a pedagogy “of” the digital and a pedagogy “for” the digital, arguing that the digital should not be considered a separate domain, but rather a structural condition of contemporary experience that challenges the entire pedagogical field. The analysis is structured around three main dimensions: ontological-epistemological, didactic-methodological, and critical. At the ontological level, the digital is interpreted as a cultural environment that reshapes categories such as presence, relationship, and subjectivity, particularly in light of the transformations brought about by platforms, algorithms, and artificial intelligence. From a didactic perspective, the author warns against both uncritical adoption of technologies and technophobic resistance, advocating instead for their thoughtful integration within pedagogical models grounded in personalization, educational relationships, and experiential learning. From a critical standpoint, the essay highlights the risks of disintermediation, surveillance, and loss of autonomy, emphasizing the need for pedagogical discernment and responsibility. The contribution concludes by addressing emerging scenarios—especially those related to artificial intelligence—stressing the irreplaceable role of teachers, mediation, and the quality of educational relationships in preventing forms of self-instruction and ensuring that technological innovation remains oriented toward human development.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



