This chapter defines the concept of social capital adopted throughout the volume and situates it within the long-standing Italian debate on civic culture. Building on Putnam, Leonardi and Nanetti’s (Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, 1993), social capital is conceived as a moral and value-related collective resource that binds individuals to a wider community through a shared sense of civic duty and responsibility. The chapter retraces the Italian research traditions that have shaped the study of civic culture and social capital. It discusses the enduring influence of Banfield’s notion of amoral familism (1958), the seminal contribution of Almond and Verba’s (The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Little, Brown, 1963), and later studies on territorial political subcultures and subnational differences in political, economic and civic structures that led to the idea of three, four, or even five “Italies” (Bagnasco, Tre Italie: La problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano, Il Mulino, 1977; Caciagli, Polis 3: 429–457, 1988; Cartocci, Polis: ricerche e studi su società e politica in Italia 1: 481–514, 1987; Tullio-Altan, La nostra Italia: Arretratezza socioculturale, clientelismo, trasformismo e ribellismo dall’Unità ad oggi, Feltrinelli, 1986; Trigilia,Grandi partiti e piccole imprese:
Bordandini, P. (2025). Social Capital and Civic Culture in Italy. Cham : Palgrave Macmillan [10.1007/978-3-032-14753-0_2].
Social Capital and Civic Culture in Italy
Bordandini, Paola
2025
Abstract
This chapter defines the concept of social capital adopted throughout the volume and situates it within the long-standing Italian debate on civic culture. Building on Putnam, Leonardi and Nanetti’s (Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, 1993), social capital is conceived as a moral and value-related collective resource that binds individuals to a wider community through a shared sense of civic duty and responsibility. The chapter retraces the Italian research traditions that have shaped the study of civic culture and social capital. It discusses the enduring influence of Banfield’s notion of amoral familism (1958), the seminal contribution of Almond and Verba’s (The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Little, Brown, 1963), and later studies on territorial political subcultures and subnational differences in political, economic and civic structures that led to the idea of three, four, or even five “Italies” (Bagnasco, Tre Italie: La problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano, Il Mulino, 1977; Caciagli, Polis 3: 429–457, 1988; Cartocci, Polis: ricerche e studi su società e politica in Italia 1: 481–514, 1987; Tullio-Altan, La nostra Italia: Arretratezza socioculturale, clientelismo, trasformismo e ribellismo dall’Unità ad oggi, Feltrinelli, 1986; Trigilia,Grandi partiti e piccole imprese:| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Social Capital and Civic Culture in Italy.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Capitolo di libro
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
320.3 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
320.3 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



