This chapter offers a comparative study of five urban commons experiences in the city of Bologna. They include three experiences that are social movement and activist in nature, one that is more of a cultural movement and one that is community-based. LU and PT self-identify as anti-systemic, anti-capitalist, CO aims at a more inclusive society that recognizes the rights of the LGBTQIA+ communities, while BL questions the sustainability of the mass consumption capitalist model. IS is a community-based group creating and sustaining neighbourhood social cohesion. Five different categories of analysis the authors selected to offer a deeper understanding of the nature and scope of each of these experiences and to what extent they can be understood as forms of citizenship: (a) inclusive commoning and governance; (b) feminist values and practices; (c) goals around identified and satisfied needs of beneficiaries; (d) appropriation of space/right to the city and ecology; (e) implication in politics and sociopolitical alliances. The authors explore the characteristics, values and actions according to which urban commons can be considered a post-capitalist or a post-industrial alternative to state- or privately run urban spaces or forms of resilience and social cohesion. The authors’ argument is that not all urban commons are post-capitalist and many experiences are in continuity with community organizing and social movement collective action that the authors define as urban citizenship
Levy, C., Alberio, M., Rita Parini, A. (2025). Chapter 4: The Commons as a Form of Urban Citizenship: From Post-Capitalist Resistance to Community Cohesion in Bologna. Leeds : Emerald Publishing Limited.
Chapter 4: The Commons as a Form of Urban Citizenship: From Post-Capitalist Resistance to Community Cohesion in Bologna
Marco Alberio;
2025
Abstract
This chapter offers a comparative study of five urban commons experiences in the city of Bologna. They include three experiences that are social movement and activist in nature, one that is more of a cultural movement and one that is community-based. LU and PT self-identify as anti-systemic, anti-capitalist, CO aims at a more inclusive society that recognizes the rights of the LGBTQIA+ communities, while BL questions the sustainability of the mass consumption capitalist model. IS is a community-based group creating and sustaining neighbourhood social cohesion. Five different categories of analysis the authors selected to offer a deeper understanding of the nature and scope of each of these experiences and to what extent they can be understood as forms of citizenship: (a) inclusive commoning and governance; (b) feminist values and practices; (c) goals around identified and satisfied needs of beneficiaries; (d) appropriation of space/right to the city and ecology; (e) implication in politics and sociopolitical alliances. The authors explore the characteristics, values and actions according to which urban commons can be considered a post-capitalist or a post-industrial alternative to state- or privately run urban spaces or forms of resilience and social cohesion. The authors’ argument is that not all urban commons are post-capitalist and many experiences are in continuity with community organizing and social movement collective action that the authors define as urban citizenshipI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


