The simplistic concept that mitochondria are merely the power factories of the cell by way of performing ATP synthesis through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), and as such that they are discrete semi-autonomous organelles, has given way to the concept of a dynamic network that fuses and divides and is strictly linked to the rest of the cell structures, thereby directing a variety of functions central to cellular life, death and differentiation.1 It is therefore not surprising that mitochondrial dysfunction has emerged as a key factor in a myriad of diseases, including common degenerative and metabolic disorders.2 Moreover, mitochondrial dysfunction is certainly related to the ageing process,3 although the mechanism is still strongly debated. A major common determinant of the involvement of mitochondria in the aetiology and pathogenesis of so many diseases has been considered their key role in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS); although ROS are generated by several other cellular systems, mitochondrial ROS arising from the respiratory chain appear to be strategic for the development of pathological states. Nevertheless, contrary to previous understanding that ROS are deleterious by-products whose production should be avoided, it is now clear that ROS are physiological messengers acting through redox modifications in signalling proteins. For this reason it is believed that ageing may be, at least in part, the result of alterations of signalling pathways such as those involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and apoptosis, induced by an increasing ROS production.4,5 Among the factors controlling ROS generation by mitochondria, it is becoming increasingly clear that a major role is played by the supramolecular structure of mitochondrial respiratory complexes. The FMN- and CoQ-binding sites of NADH-Coenzyme Q reductase (Complex I) and the Qo site (at the outer or positive side) of ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase (Complex III) are often invoked as the most important mitochondrial superoxide producers. In the classic model of the electron transfer chain,6 complexes I and III are randomly distributed in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) together with the two other major multi-subunit complexes, designated as succinate-CoQ reductase (Complex II) and cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV). The enzyme complexes are functionally connected by two redox-active molecules, that is, a lipophilic quinone (Coenzyme Q or ubiquinone, CoQ) embedded in the membrane lipid bilayer, and a hydrophilic heme protein (cytochrome c) localized on the external surface of the IMM. Contrary to the view of a random organization of the respiratory chain complexes, prevailing in the last decades of the past century,6 evidence has now accumulated that a large proportion of the respiratory complexes in a variety of organisms is arranged in supramolecular assemblies called supercomplexes or respirasomes.7–10 The natural assembly of the respiratory Complexes I, III and IV into supramolecular stoichiometric entities, such as I1III2IV0–4 can have deep functional implications on the properties of the respiratory chain, possibly being enzymatic channelling the most striking consequence of supercomplex association.10–12 There is increasing evidence that supercomplexes are not static assemblies of the individual complexes, but are present in a dynamic state, described by the plasticity model.13 A newly discovered consequence of disruption of supercomplex association is an increase of ROS production.14 In this chapter, we would like to provide experimental evidence that the dynamic nature of supercomplexes is at the basis of a control mechanism of the ROS concentration in the cell. An alteration of this finely tuned mechanism would induce a catastrophic loss of control of ROS generation, culminating in the establishment of a vicious circle of mitochondrial damage and ROS generation that is at the basis of pathological changes. In particular we will provide evidence pertaining to the role that such a vicious circle may have in the ageing process.

Genova, M.l., Lenaz, G. (2016). Mitochondrial Supercomplexes and ROS Regulation Implications for Ageing. 6000 BROKEN SOUND PARKWAY NW, STE 300, BOCA RATON, FL 33487-2742 USA : CRC PRESS-TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP [10.1201/b19087].

Mitochondrial Supercomplexes and ROS Regulation Implications for Ageing

Genova, ML
Primo
;
Lenaz, G
Ultimo
2016

Abstract

The simplistic concept that mitochondria are merely the power factories of the cell by way of performing ATP synthesis through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), and as such that they are discrete semi-autonomous organelles, has given way to the concept of a dynamic network that fuses and divides and is strictly linked to the rest of the cell structures, thereby directing a variety of functions central to cellular life, death and differentiation.1 It is therefore not surprising that mitochondrial dysfunction has emerged as a key factor in a myriad of diseases, including common degenerative and metabolic disorders.2 Moreover, mitochondrial dysfunction is certainly related to the ageing process,3 although the mechanism is still strongly debated. A major common determinant of the involvement of mitochondria in the aetiology and pathogenesis of so many diseases has been considered their key role in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS); although ROS are generated by several other cellular systems, mitochondrial ROS arising from the respiratory chain appear to be strategic for the development of pathological states. Nevertheless, contrary to previous understanding that ROS are deleterious by-products whose production should be avoided, it is now clear that ROS are physiological messengers acting through redox modifications in signalling proteins. For this reason it is believed that ageing may be, at least in part, the result of alterations of signalling pathways such as those involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and apoptosis, induced by an increasing ROS production.4,5 Among the factors controlling ROS generation by mitochondria, it is becoming increasingly clear that a major role is played by the supramolecular structure of mitochondrial respiratory complexes. The FMN- and CoQ-binding sites of NADH-Coenzyme Q reductase (Complex I) and the Qo site (at the outer or positive side) of ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase (Complex III) are often invoked as the most important mitochondrial superoxide producers. In the classic model of the electron transfer chain,6 complexes I and III are randomly distributed in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) together with the two other major multi-subunit complexes, designated as succinate-CoQ reductase (Complex II) and cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV). The enzyme complexes are functionally connected by two redox-active molecules, that is, a lipophilic quinone (Coenzyme Q or ubiquinone, CoQ) embedded in the membrane lipid bilayer, and a hydrophilic heme protein (cytochrome c) localized on the external surface of the IMM. Contrary to the view of a random organization of the respiratory chain complexes, prevailing in the last decades of the past century,6 evidence has now accumulated that a large proportion of the respiratory complexes in a variety of organisms is arranged in supramolecular assemblies called supercomplexes or respirasomes.7–10 The natural assembly of the respiratory Complexes I, III and IV into supramolecular stoichiometric entities, such as I1III2IV0–4 can have deep functional implications on the properties of the respiratory chain, possibly being enzymatic channelling the most striking consequence of supercomplex association.10–12 There is increasing evidence that supercomplexes are not static assemblies of the individual complexes, but are present in a dynamic state, described by the plasticity model.13 A newly discovered consequence of disruption of supercomplex association is an increase of ROS production.14 In this chapter, we would like to provide experimental evidence that the dynamic nature of supercomplexes is at the basis of a control mechanism of the ROS concentration in the cell. An alteration of this finely tuned mechanism would induce a catastrophic loss of control of ROS generation, culminating in the establishment of a vicious circle of mitochondrial damage and ROS generation that is at the basis of pathological changes. In particular we will provide evidence pertaining to the role that such a vicious circle may have in the ageing process.
2016
REDOX PROTEINS IN SUPERCOMPLEXES AND SIGNALOSOMES
107
147
Genova, M.l., Lenaz, G. (2016). Mitochondrial Supercomplexes and ROS Regulation Implications for Ageing. 6000 BROKEN SOUND PARKWAY NW, STE 300, BOCA RATON, FL 33487-2742 USA : CRC PRESS-TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP [10.1201/b19087].
Genova, Ml; Lenaz, G
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1000923
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact