This paper provides an analysis of a projection method for the solution of the unsteady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. We describe the incremental pressure projection method and we analyse the splitting errors due to the inexact boundary conditions on pressure and velocity fields. In order to improve the solution of the incremental pressure-projection method, we also introduce the rotational pressure-projection method and the penalty method. Moreover, we compare the solution of the projection methods with the one obtained with the Navier-Stokes coupled system. In particular, three specific flow patterns are considered. The first pattern is a simple model of a fluid subject to a gravity force. The second pattern is the motion of a fluid in a vertical duct, subject to gravity and to another force of the same magnitude, but in the horizontal plane. The third pattern is the motion of a fluid past a cylindrical obstacle. In the last case we analyse the numerical viscosity introduced with the method in order to verify that the instability driven by the convective term is still present.

A comparison between a pressure projection method and a fully coupled multigrid FEM Navier-Stokes solver / F. Bassenghi; G. Bornia; A. Cervone; S. Manservisi; R. Scardovelli. - STAMPA. - 1:(2010), pp. 213-218. (Intervento presentato al convegno 28th UIT Heat Transfer Congress tenutosi a Brescia, Italia nel 21-23, Giugno, 2010).

A comparison between a pressure projection method and a fully coupled multigrid FEM Navier-Stokes solver

MANSERVISI, SANDRO;SCARDOVELLI, RUBEN
2010

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of a projection method for the solution of the unsteady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. We describe the incremental pressure projection method and we analyse the splitting errors due to the inexact boundary conditions on pressure and velocity fields. In order to improve the solution of the incremental pressure-projection method, we also introduce the rotational pressure-projection method and the penalty method. Moreover, we compare the solution of the projection methods with the one obtained with the Navier-Stokes coupled system. In particular, three specific flow patterns are considered. The first pattern is a simple model of a fluid subject to a gravity force. The second pattern is the motion of a fluid in a vertical duct, subject to gravity and to another force of the same magnitude, but in the horizontal plane. The third pattern is the motion of a fluid past a cylindrical obstacle. In the last case we analyse the numerical viscosity introduced with the method in order to verify that the instability driven by the convective term is still present.
2010
UIT 2010 Proceedings of the 28th UIT Heat Transfer Congress
213
218
A comparison between a pressure projection method and a fully coupled multigrid FEM Navier-Stokes solver / F. Bassenghi; G. Bornia; A. Cervone; S. Manservisi; R. Scardovelli. - STAMPA. - 1:(2010), pp. 213-218. (Intervento presentato al convegno 28th UIT Heat Transfer Congress tenutosi a Brescia, Italia nel 21-23, Giugno, 2010).
F. Bassenghi; G. Bornia; A. Cervone; S. Manservisi; R. Scardovelli
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/91527
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact