This is a rather unusual comment that focuses on how a specific figure was constructed rather than on actual scientific results. The figure in question (Figure 9 from Pino et al. 2009) does not even show new data or results, but is simply a summary of slip models that have been proposed in the literature for the 1908 earthquake. All models describe slip distributions from coseismic elevation changes except for one, derived by Pino et al. (2000) based on waveform modeling of historical seismograms.

Reply to “Comment on ‘The 28 December 1908 Messina Straits Earthquake (Mw 7.1): A Great Earthquake throughout a Century of Seismology,’ by N. A. Pino, A. Piatanesi, G. Valensise, and E. Boschi” by A. Amoruso, L. Crescentini, and R. Scarpa

BOSCHI, ENZO
2010

Abstract

This is a rather unusual comment that focuses on how a specific figure was constructed rather than on actual scientific results. The figure in question (Figure 9 from Pino et al. 2009) does not even show new data or results, but is simply a summary of slip models that have been proposed in the literature for the 1908 earthquake. All models describe slip distributions from coseismic elevation changes except for one, derived by Pino et al. (2000) based on waveform modeling of historical seismograms.
2010
N. A. Pino; A. Piatanesi; G. Valensise; E. Boschi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/89071
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact