A Lucretian verse (1.304: tangere enim et tangi nisi corpus nulla potest res), located in the context of the exposition of the atomistic doctrine as the basis of matter, had a history of interpretation that lasted several centuries, involving classical and Christian authors. This denies that Lucretius, almost the only intermediary of Epicurean thought for Latin writers, must still be considered an author disliked by Christian authors, as a detailed examination can only confirm.

UN POETA PER TUTTE LE STAGIONI. USI E RIUSI D’UN VERSO LUCREZIANO

Antonio Cacciari
2021

Abstract

A Lucretian verse (1.304: tangere enim et tangi nisi corpus nulla potest res), located in the context of the exposition of the atomistic doctrine as the basis of matter, had a history of interpretation that lasted several centuries, involving classical and Christian authors. This denies that Lucretius, almost the only intermediary of Epicurean thought for Latin writers, must still be considered an author disliked by Christian authors, as a detailed examination can only confirm.
2021
LUCREZIO, SENECA E NOI Studi per Ivano Dionigi
29
40
Antonio Cacciari
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cacciari.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Capitolo
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 849.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
849.22 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/874394
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact