A Lucretian verse (1.304: tangere enim et tangi nisi corpus nulla potest res), located in the context of the exposition of the atomistic doctrine as the basis of matter, had a history of interpretation that lasted several centuries, involving classical and Christian authors. This denies that Lucretius, almost the only intermediary of Epicurean thought for Latin writers, must still be considered an author disliked by Christian authors, as a detailed examination can only confirm.
UN POETA PER TUTTE LE STAGIONI. USI E RIUSI D’UN VERSO LUCREZIANO
Antonio Cacciari
2021
Abstract
A Lucretian verse (1.304: tangere enim et tangi nisi corpus nulla potest res), located in the context of the exposition of the atomistic doctrine as the basis of matter, had a history of interpretation that lasted several centuries, involving classical and Christian authors. This denies that Lucretius, almost the only intermediary of Epicurean thought for Latin writers, must still be considered an author disliked by Christian authors, as a detailed examination can only confirm.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Cacciari.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Capitolo
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
849.22 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
849.22 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.