Purpose: The phase III COLUMBA study evaluated daratumumab (DARA) intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Here, we report patient-reported satisfaction with therapy (SWT) in COLUMBA. Methods: DARA IV or DARA SC was administered weekly (cycles 1–2), every 2 weeks (cycles 3–6), and every 4 weeks (cycles 7 +). Patients completed a modified version of the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) at weekly (cycles 1–2) and monthly (cycles 3 +) intervals and at the end of treatment. Results for each item and the SWT domain score were summarized using descriptive statistics. The distribution of responses for individual items was calculated for each assessment. The proportion of patients for whom SWT domain score change from first assessment met or exceeded the minimally important difference (MID) of 5.9 points was calculated at each assessment time point. Results: Two-hundred fifty-nine patients were randomized to DARA IV and 263 to DARA SC. Mean scores for SWT domain questions were high and largely positive during treatment. Responses indicating positive perceptions of therapy were given by a numerically greater proportion of patients in the DARA SC group than the DARA IV group for most questions. Changes from the first assessment in SWT domain scores met or exceeded the MID for an average of ~ 40% of patients. Conclusion: In COLUMBA, modified CTSQ results suggest patients in the DARA SC group were more satisfied with their cancer therapy than those in the DARA IV group. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03277105. Registered September 8, 2107.

Greater treatment satisfaction in patients receiving daratumumab subcutaneous vs. intravenous for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: COLUMBA clinical trial results / Usmani S.Z.; Mateos M.-V.; Hungria V.; Iida S.; Bahlis N.J.; Nahi H.; Magen H.; Cavo M.; Hulin C.; White D.; De Stefano V.; Fastenau J.; Slavcev M.; Heuck C.; Qin X.; Pei H.; Masterson T.; Lantz K.; Gries K.S.. - In: JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0171-5216. - STAMPA. - 147:2(2021), pp. 619-631. [10.1007/s00432-020-03365-w]

Greater treatment satisfaction in patients receiving daratumumab subcutaneous vs. intravenous for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: COLUMBA clinical trial results

Cavo M.;
2021

Abstract

Purpose: The phase III COLUMBA study evaluated daratumumab (DARA) intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Here, we report patient-reported satisfaction with therapy (SWT) in COLUMBA. Methods: DARA IV or DARA SC was administered weekly (cycles 1–2), every 2 weeks (cycles 3–6), and every 4 weeks (cycles 7 +). Patients completed a modified version of the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) at weekly (cycles 1–2) and monthly (cycles 3 +) intervals and at the end of treatment. Results for each item and the SWT domain score were summarized using descriptive statistics. The distribution of responses for individual items was calculated for each assessment. The proportion of patients for whom SWT domain score change from first assessment met or exceeded the minimally important difference (MID) of 5.9 points was calculated at each assessment time point. Results: Two-hundred fifty-nine patients were randomized to DARA IV and 263 to DARA SC. Mean scores for SWT domain questions were high and largely positive during treatment. Responses indicating positive perceptions of therapy were given by a numerically greater proportion of patients in the DARA SC group than the DARA IV group for most questions. Changes from the first assessment in SWT domain scores met or exceeded the MID for an average of ~ 40% of patients. Conclusion: In COLUMBA, modified CTSQ results suggest patients in the DARA SC group were more satisfied with their cancer therapy than those in the DARA IV group. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03277105. Registered September 8, 2107.
2021
Greater treatment satisfaction in patients receiving daratumumab subcutaneous vs. intravenous for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: COLUMBA clinical trial results / Usmani S.Z.; Mateos M.-V.; Hungria V.; Iida S.; Bahlis N.J.; Nahi H.; Magen H.; Cavo M.; Hulin C.; White D.; De Stefano V.; Fastenau J.; Slavcev M.; Heuck C.; Qin X.; Pei H.; Masterson T.; Lantz K.; Gries K.S.. - In: JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0171-5216. - STAMPA. - 147:2(2021), pp. 619-631. [10.1007/s00432-020-03365-w]
Usmani S.Z.; Mateos M.-V.; Hungria V.; Iida S.; Bahlis N.J.; Nahi H.; Magen H.; Cavo M.; Hulin C.; White D.; De Stefano V.; Fastenau J.; Slavcev M.; Heuck C.; Qin X.; Pei H.; Masterson T.; Lantz K.; Gries K.S.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/865233
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact