Background: Despite its proven activity as third-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), regorafenib can present a poor tolerability profile which often leads to treatment modifications and transient or permanent discontinuation; thus, in clinical practice physicians usually adopt various dosing and interval schedules to counteract regorafenib-related adverse events and avoid treatment interruption. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of personalized schedules of regorafenib in patients with metastatic GIST, in comparison with the standard schedule (160 mg daily, 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off). Patients and methods: Institutional registries across seven Italian reference centers were retrospectively reviewed and data of interest retrieved to identify patients with GIST who had received regorafenib from February 2013 to January 2021. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test to make comparisons. Results: Of a total of 152 patients with GIST, 49 were treated with standard dose, while 103 received personalized schedules. At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.73-11.0 months] versus 9.7 months (95% CI 7.9-14.5 months) in the standard-dose and the personalized schedule groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.75; P = 0.00052]. Median overall survival was 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-21.8 months) versus 20.5 months (95% CI 15.0-25.4 months), respectively (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.22; P = 0.16). Conclusions: Regorafenib-personalized schedules are commonly adopted in daily clinical practice of high-volume GIST expert centers and correlate with significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, regorafenib treatment optimization in patients with GIST may represent the best strategy to maximize long-term therapy.

Standard versus personalized schedule of regorafenib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world study / Nannini M.; Rizzo A.; Nigro M.C.; Vincenzi B.; Mazzocca A.; Grignani G.; Merlini A.; D'Ambrosio L.; Tolomeo F.; Badalamenti G.; Incorvaia L.; Bonasera A.; Fumagalli E.; Miliziano D.; Ligorio F.; Brunello A.; Chiusole B.; Gasperoni S.; Novelli M.; Pantaleo M.A.. - In: ESMO OPEN. - ISSN 2059-7029. - STAMPA. - 6:4(2021), pp. 100222.100222-100222.100228. [10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100222]

Standard versus personalized schedule of regorafenib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world study

Nigro M. C.;Merlini A.;Ligorio F.;Brunello A.;Novelli M.;Pantaleo M. A.
2021

Abstract

Background: Despite its proven activity as third-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), regorafenib can present a poor tolerability profile which often leads to treatment modifications and transient or permanent discontinuation; thus, in clinical practice physicians usually adopt various dosing and interval schedules to counteract regorafenib-related adverse events and avoid treatment interruption. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of personalized schedules of regorafenib in patients with metastatic GIST, in comparison with the standard schedule (160 mg daily, 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off). Patients and methods: Institutional registries across seven Italian reference centers were retrospectively reviewed and data of interest retrieved to identify patients with GIST who had received regorafenib from February 2013 to January 2021. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test to make comparisons. Results: Of a total of 152 patients with GIST, 49 were treated with standard dose, while 103 received personalized schedules. At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.73-11.0 months] versus 9.7 months (95% CI 7.9-14.5 months) in the standard-dose and the personalized schedule groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.75; P = 0.00052]. Median overall survival was 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-21.8 months) versus 20.5 months (95% CI 15.0-25.4 months), respectively (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.22; P = 0.16). Conclusions: Regorafenib-personalized schedules are commonly adopted in daily clinical practice of high-volume GIST expert centers and correlate with significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, regorafenib treatment optimization in patients with GIST may represent the best strategy to maximize long-term therapy.
2021
Standard versus personalized schedule of regorafenib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world study / Nannini M.; Rizzo A.; Nigro M.C.; Vincenzi B.; Mazzocca A.; Grignani G.; Merlini A.; D'Ambrosio L.; Tolomeo F.; Badalamenti G.; Incorvaia L.; Bonasera A.; Fumagalli E.; Miliziano D.; Ligorio F.; Brunello A.; Chiusole B.; Gasperoni S.; Novelli M.; Pantaleo M.A.. - In: ESMO OPEN. - ISSN 2059-7029. - STAMPA. - 6:4(2021), pp. 100222.100222-100222.100228. [10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100222]
Nannini M.; Rizzo A.; Nigro M.C.; Vincenzi B.; Mazzocca A.; Grignani G.; Merlini A.; D'Ambrosio L.; Tolomeo F.; Badalamenti G.; Incorvaia L.; Bonasera A.; Fumagalli E.; Miliziano D.; Ligorio F.; Brunello A.; Chiusole B.; Gasperoni S.; Novelli M.; Pantaleo M.A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PIIS2059702921001836.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 395.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
395.2 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
mmc1 (3).docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Altra tipologia di licenza compatibile con Open Access
Dimensione 18.95 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
18.95 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/864336
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact