The purpose of this study is to review the clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and potential contributing and prognostic factors of bone metastases from gynecological cancers (GCs). A systematic literature search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was conducted. Thirty-one studies, all retrospective, were included in this review, for a total of 2880 patients with GC bone metastases. Primary tumors leading to bone metastases included endometrial cancer (EC), cervical cancer (CC), ovarian cancer (OC), uterine sarcoma (US) and vulvar cancer (VuC), mainly with an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage of III and IV. The main bone metastatic lesion site was the vertebral column, followed by the pelvic bone and lower extremity bones. The median survival rate after bone metastases diagnosis ranged from 3.0 to 45 months. The most frequent treatments were palliative and included radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by surgery. The findings of this review give a first dataset for a greater understanding of GC bone metastases that could help clinicians move toward a more “personalized” and thus more effective patient management.

Clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and potential contributing and prognostic factors in patients with bone metastases from gynecological cancers: A systematic review / Salamanna F.; Perrone A.M.; Contartese D.; Borsari V.; Gasbarrini A.; Terzi S.; De Iaco P.; Fini M.. - In: DIAGNOSTICS. - ISSN 2075-4418. - ELETTRONICO. - 11:9(2021), pp. 1626.1626-1626.1634. [10.3390/diagnostics11091626]

Clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and potential contributing and prognostic factors in patients with bone metastases from gynecological cancers: A systematic review

Perrone A. M.;Contartese D.;De Iaco P.;
2021

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review the clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and potential contributing and prognostic factors of bone metastases from gynecological cancers (GCs). A systematic literature search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was conducted. Thirty-one studies, all retrospective, were included in this review, for a total of 2880 patients with GC bone metastases. Primary tumors leading to bone metastases included endometrial cancer (EC), cervical cancer (CC), ovarian cancer (OC), uterine sarcoma (US) and vulvar cancer (VuC), mainly with an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage of III and IV. The main bone metastatic lesion site was the vertebral column, followed by the pelvic bone and lower extremity bones. The median survival rate after bone metastases diagnosis ranged from 3.0 to 45 months. The most frequent treatments were palliative and included radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by surgery. The findings of this review give a first dataset for a greater understanding of GC bone metastases that could help clinicians move toward a more “personalized” and thus more effective patient management.
2021
Clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and potential contributing and prognostic factors in patients with bone metastases from gynecological cancers: A systematic review / Salamanna F.; Perrone A.M.; Contartese D.; Borsari V.; Gasbarrini A.; Terzi S.; De Iaco P.; Fini M.. - In: DIAGNOSTICS. - ISSN 2075-4418. - ELETTRONICO. - 11:9(2021), pp. 1626.1626-1626.1634. [10.3390/diagnostics11091626]
Salamanna F.; Perrone A.M.; Contartese D.; Borsari V.; Gasbarrini A.; Terzi S.; De Iaco P.; Fini M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
salamanna.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 1.36 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.36 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/852427
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact