This study discusses the interplay between metrics used to measure the explainability of the AI systems and the proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act. A standardisation process is ongoing: several entities (e.g. ISO) and scholars are discussing how to design systems that are compliant with the forthcoming Act and explainability metrics play a significant role. This study identifies the requirements that such a metric should possess to ease compliance with the AI Act. It does so according to an interdisciplinary approach, i.e. by departing from the philosophical concept of explainability and discussing some metrics proposed by scholars and standardisation entities through the lenses of the explainability obligations set by the proposed AI Act. Our analysis proposes that metrics to measure the kind of explainability endorsed by the proposed AI Act shall be risk-focused, model-agnostic, goal-aware, intelligible & accessible. This is why we discuss the extent to which these requirements are met by the metrics currently under discussion

A Survey on Methods and Metrics for the Assessment of Explainability Under the Proposed AI Act / Sovrano, Francesco; Sapienza, Salvatore; Palmirani, Monica; Vitali, Fabio. - ELETTRONICO. - (2021), pp. 235-242. (Intervento presentato al convegno JURIX 2021: 4th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems tenutosi a Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania nel December 8-10, 2021) [10.3233/FAIA210342].

A Survey on Methods and Metrics for the Assessment of Explainability Under the Proposed AI Act

Sovrano, Francesco
;
Sapienza, Salvatore
;
Palmirani, Monica;Vitali, Fabio
2021

Abstract

This study discusses the interplay between metrics used to measure the explainability of the AI systems and the proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act. A standardisation process is ongoing: several entities (e.g. ISO) and scholars are discussing how to design systems that are compliant with the forthcoming Act and explainability metrics play a significant role. This study identifies the requirements that such a metric should possess to ease compliance with the AI Act. It does so according to an interdisciplinary approach, i.e. by departing from the philosophical concept of explainability and discussing some metrics proposed by scholars and standardisation entities through the lenses of the explainability obligations set by the proposed AI Act. Our analysis proposes that metrics to measure the kind of explainability endorsed by the proposed AI Act shall be risk-focused, model-agnostic, goal-aware, intelligible & accessible. This is why we discuss the extent to which these requirements are met by the metrics currently under discussion
2021
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems
235
242
A Survey on Methods and Metrics for the Assessment of Explainability Under the Proposed AI Act / Sovrano, Francesco; Sapienza, Salvatore; Palmirani, Monica; Vitali, Fabio. - ELETTRONICO. - (2021), pp. 235-242. (Intervento presentato al convegno JURIX 2021: 4th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems tenutosi a Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania nel December 8-10, 2021) [10.3233/FAIA210342].
Sovrano, Francesco; Sapienza, Salvatore; Palmirani, Monica; Vitali, Fabio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FAIA-346-FAIA210342.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 230.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
230.33 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/841429
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact