Trauma accounts for a third of the deaths in Western countries, exceeded only by cardiovascular disease and cancer. The high risk of massive bleeding, which depends not only on the type of fractures, but also on the severity of any associated parenchymal injuries, makes pelvic fractures one of the most life-threatening skeletal injuries, with a high mortality rate. Therefore, pelvic trauma represents an important condition to correctly and early recognize, manage, and treat. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach involving trauma surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, emergency room physicians and interventional radiologists is needed to promptly manage the resuscitation of pelvic trauma patients and ensure the best outcomes, both in terms of time and costs. Over the years, the role of interventional radiology in the management of patient bleeding due to pelvic trauma has been increasing. However, the current guidelines on the management of these patients do not adequately reflect or address the varied nature of injuries faced by the interventional radiologist. In fact, in the therapeutic algorithm of these patients, after the word “ANGIO”, there are no reports on the different possibilities that an interventional radiologist has to face during the procedure. Furthermore, variations exist in the techniques and materials for performing angioembolization in bleeding patients with pelvic trauma. Due to these differences, the outcomes differ among different published series. This article has the aim to review the recent literature on optimal imaging assessment and management of pelvic trauma, defining the role of the interventional radiologist within the multidisciplinary team, suggesting the introduction of common and unequivocal terminology in every step of the angiographic procedure. Moreover, according to these suggestions, the present paper tries to expand the previously drafted algorithm exploring the role of the interventional radiologist in pelvic trauma, especially given the multidisciplinary setting.

Proposal of standardization of every step of angiographic procedure in bleeding patients from pelvic trauma / Renzulli M.; Ierardi A.M.; Brandi N.; Battisti S.; Giampalma E.; Marasco G.; Spinelli D.; Principi T.; Catena F.; Khan M.; Di Saverio S.; Carrafiello G.; Golfieri R.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0949-2321. - STAMPA. - 26:1(2021), pp. 123.123-123.136. [10.1186/s40001-021-00594-8]

Proposal of standardization of every step of angiographic procedure in bleeding patients from pelvic trauma

Renzulli M.;Brandi N.;Battisti S.;Marasco G.;Spinelli D.;Di Saverio S.;Golfieri R.
2021

Abstract

Trauma accounts for a third of the deaths in Western countries, exceeded only by cardiovascular disease and cancer. The high risk of massive bleeding, which depends not only on the type of fractures, but also on the severity of any associated parenchymal injuries, makes pelvic fractures one of the most life-threatening skeletal injuries, with a high mortality rate. Therefore, pelvic trauma represents an important condition to correctly and early recognize, manage, and treat. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach involving trauma surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, emergency room physicians and interventional radiologists is needed to promptly manage the resuscitation of pelvic trauma patients and ensure the best outcomes, both in terms of time and costs. Over the years, the role of interventional radiology in the management of patient bleeding due to pelvic trauma has been increasing. However, the current guidelines on the management of these patients do not adequately reflect or address the varied nature of injuries faced by the interventional radiologist. In fact, in the therapeutic algorithm of these patients, after the word “ANGIO”, there are no reports on the different possibilities that an interventional radiologist has to face during the procedure. Furthermore, variations exist in the techniques and materials for performing angioembolization in bleeding patients with pelvic trauma. Due to these differences, the outcomes differ among different published series. This article has the aim to review the recent literature on optimal imaging assessment and management of pelvic trauma, defining the role of the interventional radiologist within the multidisciplinary team, suggesting the introduction of common and unequivocal terminology in every step of the angiographic procedure. Moreover, according to these suggestions, the present paper tries to expand the previously drafted algorithm exploring the role of the interventional radiologist in pelvic trauma, especially given the multidisciplinary setting.
2021
Proposal of standardization of every step of angiographic procedure in bleeding patients from pelvic trauma / Renzulli M.; Ierardi A.M.; Brandi N.; Battisti S.; Giampalma E.; Marasco G.; Spinelli D.; Principi T.; Catena F.; Khan M.; Di Saverio S.; Carrafiello G.; Golfieri R.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0949-2321. - STAMPA. - 26:1(2021), pp. 123.123-123.136. [10.1186/s40001-021-00594-8]
Renzulli M.; Ierardi A.M.; Brandi N.; Battisti S.; Giampalma E.; Marasco G.; Spinelli D.; Principi T.; Catena F.; Khan M.; Di Saverio S.; Carrafiello G.; Golfieri R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
40001_2021_Article_594.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 2.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/838929
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact