To optimise treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines recommend using risk stratification, with the aim of patients achieving low-risk status. Previous analyses of registries made progress in using risk stratification approaches, however, the focus is often on patients with a low-risk prognosis, whereas most PAH patients are in intermediate-risk or high-risk categories. Using only six parameters with high prognostic relevance, we aimed to demonstrate a pragmatic approach to individual patient risk assessment to discriminate between patients at low risk, intermediate risk and high risk of death.

A pragmatic approach to risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension using the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines / Dardi, Fabio; Manes, Alessandra; Guarino, Daniele; Zuffa, Elisa; De Lorenzis, Alessandro; Magnani, Ilenia; Rotunno, Mariangela; Ballerini, Alberto; Lo Russo, Gerardo Vito; Nardi, Elena; Galiè, Nazzareno; Palazzini, Massimiliano. - In: OPEN HEART. - ISSN 2053-3624. - ELETTRONICO. - 8:2(2021), pp. e001725.e001725-e001725.e001725. [10.1136/openhrt-2021-001725]

A pragmatic approach to risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension using the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines

Dardi, Fabio
Primo
;
Manes, Alessandra;Guarino, Daniele;Zuffa, Elisa;De Lorenzis, Alessandro;Magnani, Ilenia;Rotunno, Mariangela;Ballerini, Alberto;Lo Russo, Gerardo Vito;Nardi, Elena;Galiè, Nazzareno;Palazzini, Massimiliano
2021

Abstract

To optimise treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines recommend using risk stratification, with the aim of patients achieving low-risk status. Previous analyses of registries made progress in using risk stratification approaches, however, the focus is often on patients with a low-risk prognosis, whereas most PAH patients are in intermediate-risk or high-risk categories. Using only six parameters with high prognostic relevance, we aimed to demonstrate a pragmatic approach to individual patient risk assessment to discriminate between patients at low risk, intermediate risk and high risk of death.
2021
A pragmatic approach to risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension using the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines / Dardi, Fabio; Manes, Alessandra; Guarino, Daniele; Zuffa, Elisa; De Lorenzis, Alessandro; Magnani, Ilenia; Rotunno, Mariangela; Ballerini, Alberto; Lo Russo, Gerardo Vito; Nardi, Elena; Galiè, Nazzareno; Palazzini, Massimiliano. - In: OPEN HEART. - ISSN 2053-3624. - ELETTRONICO. - 8:2(2021), pp. e001725.e001725-e001725.e001725. [10.1136/openhrt-2021-001725]
Dardi, Fabio; Manes, Alessandra; Guarino, Daniele; Zuffa, Elisa; De Lorenzis, Alessandro; Magnani, Ilenia; Rotunno, Mariangela; Ballerini, Alberto; Lo Russo, Gerardo Vito; Nardi, Elena; Galiè, Nazzareno; Palazzini, Massimiliano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
17. A pragmatic approach to risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension using the 2015 European Society of Cardiology:European Respiratory Society guidelines.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 2.4 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.4 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
openhrt-2021-001725supp001.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 180.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
180.16 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/835984
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact