In 2017, the decree issued by Ms Lorenzin Secretary of health increased the number of compulsory vaccinations, divided public opinion and the main political forces. Two coalitions faced each other. The first one, in favour of compulsory vaccinations, was led by institutional actors and supported by the majority of the scientific community. The rival coalition was composed of many associations and informal groups in favour of «vaccine freedom».The groups supporting mandatory vaccination relied mainly on their technical resources, while the no-vaccine movement made greater use of political resources. The institutional actors played a major role in framing the problem and drafting the decree. The opponents to the Lorenzin decree started mobilizing during the parliamentary debate, but they became more combative after the conversion law was passed.

Come i gruppi di interesse scelgono «il campo di battaglia»: il caso del decreto Lorenzin sui vaccini / Casula M.; Toth F.. - In: RIVISTA ITALIANA DI POLITICHE PUBBLICHE. - ISSN 1722-1137. - STAMPA. - 14:2(2019), pp. 277-306. [10.1483/94322]

Come i gruppi di interesse scelgono «il campo di battaglia»: il caso del decreto Lorenzin sui vaccini

Casula M.;Toth F.
2019

Abstract

In 2017, the decree issued by Ms Lorenzin Secretary of health increased the number of compulsory vaccinations, divided public opinion and the main political forces. Two coalitions faced each other. The first one, in favour of compulsory vaccinations, was led by institutional actors and supported by the majority of the scientific community. The rival coalition was composed of many associations and informal groups in favour of «vaccine freedom».The groups supporting mandatory vaccination relied mainly on their technical resources, while the no-vaccine movement made greater use of political resources. The institutional actors played a major role in framing the problem and drafting the decree. The opponents to the Lorenzin decree started mobilizing during the parliamentary debate, but they became more combative after the conversion law was passed.
2019
Come i gruppi di interesse scelgono «il campo di battaglia»: il caso del decreto Lorenzin sui vaccini / Casula M.; Toth F.. - In: RIVISTA ITALIANA DI POLITICHE PUBBLICHE. - ISSN 1722-1137. - STAMPA. - 14:2(2019), pp. 277-306. [10.1483/94322]
Casula M.; Toth F.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Come i gruppi di interesse scelgono il campo di battaglia.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 328.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
328.2 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/808688
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact