In the study of voter turnout, a gender perspective is useful in many ways. Since in Italy women gained the right to vote relatively late (only in 1946), a gender gap perspective is utmost handy to grasp why women had an immediate and massive participation over the First Republic. It is also relevant for understanding why their institutional representation comparatively still scores low and why women still do not bear a grounded interest for politics. Previous research explains this anomalous behav- iour (high turnout coupled with low institutional presence and interest) through the overwhelming social conformism in the Fi ies and Sixties as an output of a stark con- trast between mass parties, Catholic in uence and deep social peer pressure. In the Second Republic, the explanation for the rise of female abstention is related to both the secularization of social and family behaviours and a general disa ection towards poli- tics. is article outlines a long-term read of gender gap in the political turnout (1948- 2018) through the aid of two sections (one pointing out the initial characteristics for a strong mobilization of female voters and another pinpointing the reverse phenomenon in the last 30 years). We then o er some points for discussion about attributed mean- ings, working from within inequalities and possible future e ective policies to contain and reduce the gender gap in political turnout.

Quale genere di astensionismo? La partecipazione elettorale delle donne in Italia nel periodo 1948-2018 / Tuorto, D; Sartori L.. - In: SOCIETÀMUTAMENTOPOLITICA. - ISSN 2038-3150. - ELETTRONICO. - 11:22(2020), pp. 11-22. [10.13128/smp-12624]

Quale genere di astensionismo? La partecipazione elettorale delle donne in Italia nel periodo 1948-2018

Tuorto, D
Primo
;
Sartori L.
Secondo
2020

Abstract

In the study of voter turnout, a gender perspective is useful in many ways. Since in Italy women gained the right to vote relatively late (only in 1946), a gender gap perspective is utmost handy to grasp why women had an immediate and massive participation over the First Republic. It is also relevant for understanding why their institutional representation comparatively still scores low and why women still do not bear a grounded interest for politics. Previous research explains this anomalous behav- iour (high turnout coupled with low institutional presence and interest) through the overwhelming social conformism in the Fi ies and Sixties as an output of a stark con- trast between mass parties, Catholic in uence and deep social peer pressure. In the Second Republic, the explanation for the rise of female abstention is related to both the secularization of social and family behaviours and a general disa ection towards poli- tics. is article outlines a long-term read of gender gap in the political turnout (1948- 2018) through the aid of two sections (one pointing out the initial characteristics for a strong mobilization of female voters and another pinpointing the reverse phenomenon in the last 30 years). We then o er some points for discussion about attributed mean- ings, working from within inequalities and possible future e ective policies to contain and reduce the gender gap in political turnout.
2020
Quale genere di astensionismo? La partecipazione elettorale delle donne in Italia nel periodo 1948-2018 / Tuorto, D; Sartori L.. - In: SOCIETÀMUTAMENTOPOLITICA. - ISSN 2038-3150. - ELETTRONICO. - 11:22(2020), pp. 11-22. [10.13128/smp-12624]
Tuorto, D; Sartori L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
QUALE GENERE DI ASTENSIONISMO.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 435.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
435.82 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/798064
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact