This essay is meant as a genealogy of the concept of "mob" in early-modern English and British political thought, by assuming the theoretical centrality of the "multitude". The alleged wickedness of the multitude, which materialized on the stage of history during the English Civil War, was neutralized by Hobbes, who reconceived it as either a pre-political (as lying in the state of nature) or non-political (being reduced to a matter of public order) collective actor. Hobbes's depoliticization was disavowed in the 1790s, when, as a reaction against Edmund Burke's contemptuous use of the phrase "swinish multitude", some radicals subversively appropriated the notion with a positive meaning. At the beginning of the 19th century, while the lower orders identified themselves in the "working classes", the set of derogatory features traditionally ascribed to the "multitude" - fierceness, disorder, irrationality, and inability to articulate political claims - converged into the semantic field of the "mob".

This essay is meant as a genealogy of the concept of «mob» in early-modern English and British political thought, by assuming the theoretical centrality of the «multitude». The alleged wickedness of the multitude, which materialized on the stage of history during the English Civil War, was neutralized by Thomas Hobbes, who reconceived it as either a pre-political (as lying in the state of nature) or non-political (being reduced to a matter of public order) collective actor. Hobbes’s depoliticization was disavowed in the 1790s, when, as a reaction against Edmund Burke’s contemptuous use of the phrase «swinish multitude», some radicals subversively appropriated the notion with a positive meaning. At the beginning of the 19th century, while the lower orders identified themselves in the «working classes», the set of derogatory features traditionally ascribed to the «multitude» – fierceness, disorder, irrationality, and inability to articulate political claims – converged into the semantic field of the «mob».

Ascesa e declino della moltitudine inglese. Per una genealogia della «mob» / Matilde Cazzola; Raffaele Laudani. - In: FILOSOFIA POLITICA. - ISSN 0394-7297. - STAMPA. - XXXIV:3(2020), pp. 425-442. [10.1416/98523]

Ascesa e declino della moltitudine inglese. Per una genealogia della «mob»

Matilde Cazzola
;
Raffaele Laudani
2020

Abstract

This essay is meant as a genealogy of the concept of «mob» in early-modern English and British political thought, by assuming the theoretical centrality of the «multitude». The alleged wickedness of the multitude, which materialized on the stage of history during the English Civil War, was neutralized by Thomas Hobbes, who reconceived it as either a pre-political (as lying in the state of nature) or non-political (being reduced to a matter of public order) collective actor. Hobbes’s depoliticization was disavowed in the 1790s, when, as a reaction against Edmund Burke’s contemptuous use of the phrase «swinish multitude», some radicals subversively appropriated the notion with a positive meaning. At the beginning of the 19th century, while the lower orders identified themselves in the «working classes», the set of derogatory features traditionally ascribed to the «multitude» – fierceness, disorder, irrationality, and inability to articulate political claims – converged into the semantic field of the «mob».
2020
Ascesa e declino della moltitudine inglese. Per una genealogia della «mob» / Matilde Cazzola; Raffaele Laudani. - In: FILOSOFIA POLITICA. - ISSN 0394-7297. - STAMPA. - XXXIV:3(2020), pp. 425-442. [10.1416/98523]
Matilde Cazzola; Raffaele Laudani
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/780351
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact