Objectives: Malignant acral melanoma (AM) is relatively infrequent in white patients. Molecular investigations have returned variable results regarding the mutational pattern. We sought to describe the mutation profile and clinicopathologic features of AM. Methods: We investigated BRAF, KIT, and NRAS mutational status in a series of 31 AM samples from white patients. Results: Nodular melanoma was the most common histopathologic subtype (48.4%), followed by acral lentiginous melanoma (25.8%) and superficial spreading melanoma (25.8%). BRAF, KIT, and NRAS mutational rates were 12.9%, 17.2%, and 30.0%, respectively. We observed significant associations between KIT mutational status and a thinner Breslow thickness compared with wild-type (WT) status (P =. 002), NRAS mutation status and younger age compared with WT. In patients presenting at least one mutation, triple-WT patients presented metastases most frequently. Conclusions: Although these data represent preliminary results, better knowledge of tumor biology and prognosis of AM can support the clinical approach and follow-up.

BRAF, KIT, and NRAS Mutations of Acral Melanoma in White Patients / Dika, Emi; Veronesi, Giulia; Altimari, Annalisa; Riefolo, Mattia; Ravaioli, Giulia Maria; Piraccini, Bianca Maria; Lambertini, Martina; Campione, Elena; Gruppioni, Elisa; Fiorentino, Michelangelo; Melotti, Barbara; Ferracin, Manuela; Patrizi, Annalisa. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9173. - STAMPA. - 153:5(2020), pp. 664-671. [10.1093/ajcp/aqz209]

BRAF, KIT, and NRAS Mutations of Acral Melanoma in White Patients

Dika, Emi
Primo
;
Riefolo, Mattia;Ravaioli, Giulia Maria;Piraccini, Bianca Maria
;
Lambertini, Martina;Gruppioni, Elisa;Fiorentino, Michelangelo;Ferracin, Manuela;Patrizi, Annalisa
2020

Abstract

Objectives: Malignant acral melanoma (AM) is relatively infrequent in white patients. Molecular investigations have returned variable results regarding the mutational pattern. We sought to describe the mutation profile and clinicopathologic features of AM. Methods: We investigated BRAF, KIT, and NRAS mutational status in a series of 31 AM samples from white patients. Results: Nodular melanoma was the most common histopathologic subtype (48.4%), followed by acral lentiginous melanoma (25.8%) and superficial spreading melanoma (25.8%). BRAF, KIT, and NRAS mutational rates were 12.9%, 17.2%, and 30.0%, respectively. We observed significant associations between KIT mutational status and a thinner Breslow thickness compared with wild-type (WT) status (P =. 002), NRAS mutation status and younger age compared with WT. In patients presenting at least one mutation, triple-WT patients presented metastases most frequently. Conclusions: Although these data represent preliminary results, better knowledge of tumor biology and prognosis of AM can support the clinical approach and follow-up.
2020
BRAF, KIT, and NRAS Mutations of Acral Melanoma in White Patients / Dika, Emi; Veronesi, Giulia; Altimari, Annalisa; Riefolo, Mattia; Ravaioli, Giulia Maria; Piraccini, Bianca Maria; Lambertini, Martina; Campione, Elena; Gruppioni, Elisa; Fiorentino, Michelangelo; Melotti, Barbara; Ferracin, Manuela; Patrizi, Annalisa. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9173. - STAMPA. - 153:5(2020), pp. 664-671. [10.1093/ajcp/aqz209]
Dika, Emi; Veronesi, Giulia; Altimari, Annalisa; Riefolo, Mattia; Ravaioli, Giulia Maria; Piraccini, Bianca Maria; Lambertini, Martina; Campione, Elena; Gruppioni, Elisa; Fiorentino, Michelangelo; Melotti, Barbara; Ferracin, Manuela; Patrizi, Annalisa
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/756173
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact