National governments are increasingly being scrutinized for how they develop priorities and specialize decisions regarding public investments in research and innovation (R&I). Pressure stems from the need to ensure that publicly funded science and technology projects have a positive impact and increases in times of fiscal tightening and from specific policies such as the European Smart Specialization Strategy. One of the most important trade-offs governments face in the generation of specialized investments’ trajectories is overcoming information asymmetries by aggregating relevant knowledge while mediating the conflicting interests of various actors. We build on the literature on public-private partnerships (PPPs) developed for R&I by analyzing how a stable and effective priority-setting (PS) process can be implemented. We argue that a particular type of PPP, a "non-financial PPP", when characterized by participatory governance, represents an effective and legitimized structure that can transform broad goals for specific fields into prioritized technological trajectories. We then analyze the case of the Italian National Technological Clusters, which were instituted by a policy launched in 2012 by the Italian government aimed at providing a governance tool for producing legitimate and informed priorities. This analysis increases the current knowledge of the unique role that specific PPPs may have as a governance tool for R&I policy.

Non-financial PPP for participatory priority-setting in R&I policy: the case of the Italian National Technology Cluster policy

Magali Fia
2018

Abstract

National governments are increasingly being scrutinized for how they develop priorities and specialize decisions regarding public investments in research and innovation (R&I). Pressure stems from the need to ensure that publicly funded science and technology projects have a positive impact and increases in times of fiscal tightening and from specific policies such as the European Smart Specialization Strategy. One of the most important trade-offs governments face in the generation of specialized investments’ trajectories is overcoming information asymmetries by aggregating relevant knowledge while mediating the conflicting interests of various actors. We build on the literature on public-private partnerships (PPPs) developed for R&I by analyzing how a stable and effective priority-setting (PS) process can be implemented. We argue that a particular type of PPP, a "non-financial PPP", when characterized by participatory governance, represents an effective and legitimized structure that can transform broad goals for specific fields into prioritized technological trajectories. We then analyze the case of the Italian National Technological Clusters, which were instituted by a policy launched in 2012 by the Italian government aimed at providing a governance tool for producing legitimate and informed priorities. This analysis increases the current knowledge of the unique role that specific PPPs may have as a governance tool for R&I policy.
2018
Book of Abstracts. Eu-SPRI Annual Conference Vienna 2017 “The Future of STI – the Future of STI Policy”
539
543
Mario Calderini; Denise Di Dio; Magali Fia
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/746164
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact