Based on the assumption that “Drawing” aims at providing the most effective expression of the figural geometry of visual, natural or artificial objects, this paper proposes to analyse two branches of the discipline: 1) a notion of “figural geometry” of the bodies consisting of a “figurative” (iconic and analogical) and a “plastic” (mereological and gestaltic) component; 2) new “form” (eidetic) categories more suitable for the comprehension of the main aesthetic artefacts – from city to decoration – resulting from some morphogenetic models, especially those developed by Turing and Thom.
Drawing the indiscernible: morphogenesis & morphography of the artefacts / Irene Cazzaro; Fabrizio Gay. - STAMPA. - (2016), pp. 337-344. (Intervento presentato al convegno Le ragioni del Disegno / The reasons of Drawing - Atti del 38° convegno internazionale dei Docenti della Rappresentazione, 13° congresso UID tenutosi a Firenze nel 15-16-17 settembre 2016).
Drawing the indiscernible: morphogenesis & morphography of the artefacts
Irene Cazzaro
;
2016
Abstract
Based on the assumption that “Drawing” aims at providing the most effective expression of the figural geometry of visual, natural or artificial objects, this paper proposes to analyse two branches of the discipline: 1) a notion of “figural geometry” of the bodies consisting of a “figurative” (iconic and analogical) and a “plastic” (mereological and gestaltic) component; 2) new “form” (eidetic) categories more suitable for the comprehension of the main aesthetic artefacts – from city to decoration – resulting from some morphogenetic models, especially those developed by Turing and Thom.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
