This paper deals with precision farming tools (PFTs), a way of farming which relies on specialized equipment, software and information technologies services, whose importance is underlined in recent documents of the European Union. Precision farming is an integrated and sustainable farm management system making use of modern technologies to increase farm’s profitability, by reducing environmental impact. In this paper we explore the complex mechanisms that affect PFT’s adoption by Italian farmers. More precisely, we try to analyse the context-related factors affecting adoption of PFTs in the Italian farms. Little research has been carried out in Italy on this topic, therefore our paper tries to fill a gap in literature. In order to investigate the process of technology adoption related to precision agriculture, a questionnaire was submitted to a sample of Italian farms. The questionnaire has been structured in order to apply the AKAP (Awareness, Knowledge, Adoption, Product) sequence. Our analysis underlines that context-related factors are fundamental dimensions to be explored in order to specify uptake of PFTs. Therefore, the paper has relevant policy implications, within the context of a new participatory approach to agricultural innovation characterized by bottom-up processes boosted by farmers, which has informed the recent policies of agricultural innovation at the EU level.

Adoption of precision farming tools: A context-related analysis / Yari Vecchio, Marcello De Rosa, Felice Adinolfi, Luca Bartoli, Margherita Masi. - In: LAND USE POLICY. - ISSN 0264-8377. - ELETTRONICO. - 94:(2020), pp. 104481.1-104481.8. [10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104481]

Adoption of precision farming tools: A context-related analysis

Yari Vecchio
;
Felice Adinolfi;Margherita Masi
2020

Abstract

This paper deals with precision farming tools (PFTs), a way of farming which relies on specialized equipment, software and information technologies services, whose importance is underlined in recent documents of the European Union. Precision farming is an integrated and sustainable farm management system making use of modern technologies to increase farm’s profitability, by reducing environmental impact. In this paper we explore the complex mechanisms that affect PFT’s adoption by Italian farmers. More precisely, we try to analyse the context-related factors affecting adoption of PFTs in the Italian farms. Little research has been carried out in Italy on this topic, therefore our paper tries to fill a gap in literature. In order to investigate the process of technology adoption related to precision agriculture, a questionnaire was submitted to a sample of Italian farms. The questionnaire has been structured in order to apply the AKAP (Awareness, Knowledge, Adoption, Product) sequence. Our analysis underlines that context-related factors are fundamental dimensions to be explored in order to specify uptake of PFTs. Therefore, the paper has relevant policy implications, within the context of a new participatory approach to agricultural innovation characterized by bottom-up processes boosted by farmers, which has informed the recent policies of agricultural innovation at the EU level.
2020
Adoption of precision farming tools: A context-related analysis / Yari Vecchio, Marcello De Rosa, Felice Adinolfi, Luca Bartoli, Margherita Masi. - In: LAND USE POLICY. - ISSN 0264-8377. - ELETTRONICO. - 94:(2020), pp. 104481.1-104481.8. [10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104481]
Yari Vecchio, Marcello De Rosa, Felice Adinolfi, Luca Bartoli, Margherita Masi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
LandUsePolicy2020.pdf

Open Access dal 01/02/2023

Descrizione: PDF post print
Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 708.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
708.32 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/721235
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 65
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact